PC614(422 days ago)
But that's the thing, dar, there is no 'other case'. Everytime science progresses or elements are proved wrong, religion is merely altered or warped to fit.
All commentsSpam or offensive?
Don't like this? Choose what to do:
Spam mark - just hide this comment. If it
gets lots of spam marks we'll remove it
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? Delete |
Cancel
dar(442 days ago)
Nice try. But that does not work. Dawkins knows there is no God just as he knows there is no tooth fairy. He is not open to any other possibility. Boreme is actually becoming boring - the amount of Dawkins Propoganda it puts up, without ever putting hte other case
All commentsSpam or offensive?
Don't like this? Choose what to do:
Spam mark - just hide this comment. If it
gets lots of spam marks we'll remove it
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? Delete |
Cancel
Milky(442 days ago)
Dawkins has always said that science can't prove there not to be a god, only that there is no evidence for god. So for him, it's not a question of being right or wrong, it's a question of what is most likely considering the evidence we have.
All commentsSpam or offensive?
Don't like this? Choose what to do:
Spam mark - just hide this comment. If it
gets lots of spam marks we'll remove it
![MySpace](javascript:GetThis('Richard Dawkins - What if you're wrong?', '<a href="http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2007/dawkins-what-if-youre-wrong-p1.php"><img src="http://media.boreme.com/boreme/x-big/dawkins-what-if-youre-wrong.jpg" alt="Richard Dawkins - What if you're wrong?" border="0" /></a>', 'http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2007/dawkins-what-if-youre-wrong-p1.php', '')){kind=link}