Scientifically accurate visualization of 9/11 attack

Comments

Guest: David (41 days ago)
I would enjoy having a conversation with you and I do regret the MARK remark however I am very passionate about how we are constantly manipulated
Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (41 days ago)
Norad was not in air and if it was why didnt it do anything, could it be stand down order?Why is building 7 never mentioned? Mark this stinks big time.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (41 days ago)
Absolutely, plane debris from pentagon disappears and all video from area seized not to be seen by public,nothing to hide I suppose!
Spam or offensive?

markwebster (47 days ago)
David, sticks and stones etc. You have finally said something I agree with, the JP Morgans and Pharma companies who take advantage of this sort of situation for proits are disgraceful and need to be severely sanctioned. But now back to the topic, building 7 was damaged badly on the south west corner (facing the WTC) a hole covered a third of it's height and a fire raged over 20 floors. Both the Fire Chief and his deputy stated that the damage was sufficient to cause a collapse and in fact ordered their crews out of the area in preparation, there are several images clearly showing the damage prior to collapse. NORAD was to asked to respond by the FAA who in turn have to be informed by the ATC, after all this situation is not ordinary, expected or indeed what NORAD are generally tasked at. However once asked to scramble, the jets were in the air within 8 minutes (15 minutes being normal). Next.(I bet it is no debris at the pentagon - I'll start my responce now in preparation)
All Comments Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (48 days ago)
Mark, you are well named you are a MARK, I suppose you will tell me big Pharma actually cares about people and doesnt put profit ahead of everything.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (48 days ago)
Mark what is your explanation for Building #7 ,going down at 3:30 sept 11 hardly mentioned and norad not reacting a first for them and wait George Bush is a rocket scientist.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (48 days ago)
Mark,for your info war is tremendously profitable for the ultra rich since WW1 the Jp morgans etc have reaped incredible profits from wars and alleged terrorism
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Mark (48 days ago)
Also David, the debris was by no means dust as you think you know it is, the large amounts of dust was primarily dry lining board from the internals which basically vapourised, but hey let's not let a good conspiracy get in the way of truth. Are you one of those people who think man never landed on the moon as well?
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Mark (48 days ago)
the theory of controlled explosions has been debunked so many times it is hardly worth mentioning, but it has been proved many times that the energy displaced by the impact was more than sufficient to bring the building down.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (49 days ago)
Where is the simulation of the buildings going down by controlled explosions which is the only way these buildings could go down.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Tom (50 days ago)
It was actually a spaceship that crashed into the tower, using a cloaking device to appear like a plane.
Spam or offensive?

Guest (50 days ago)
America doesn't exist, it's myth too!
Spam or offensive?

Guest: PJW (51 days ago)
9-11 Myths Screwloosechange Two excellent debunking sites to answer the conspiracy types.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: David (51 days ago)
Boy that really explains how everything turned to dust,where was Norad,and thats how buiding # 7 went down too I suppose.Get your head out of the sand!
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Gary (51 days ago)
I go with the intrest point-this could help with future buildings in earthquake zones etc. Still slightly chilling though.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Known unknowns (51 days ago)
Great - now let's see a simulation that explains the disappearance of the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon ... Ah, no, wait, perhaps not. How about the CCTV footgae of that event? No. Okay.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Nath (51 days ago)
but why would this type of damage cause a huge puff of smoke to come out of the bottom of the building and make the whole thing turn to dust? :S
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Jack (51 days ago)
The only thing missing are the explosive that made the tower fall.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Tom (52 days ago)
Wow I wonder what happened next?
Spam or offensive?

Guest: bubba (53 days ago)
conspiracy theorists will just call this bullshit. No matter how many schools study the destruction of the towers, and find the same conclusions,these conspiracy nits will refuse to believe it.
Spam or offensive?

Guest (53 days ago)
Thats really quite interesting. The data collected from running the simulation can be used to build better buildings in the future, and the output method of using a visulisation means that it has a far greater understanding from it's audience than if the simulation data was displayed in numeric form.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Vexed (53 days ago)
Soooo missed the point of what this is about didn't you.
Spam or offensive?

Guest: Dude (53 days ago)
wow! amazing! what a great use of all that time, money and effort! how incredible that we now know what would happen if someone flew a plane into the world trade centre!
Spam or offensive?

Scientifically accurate visualization of 9/11 attack

Engineers and computer scientists at Purdue University recreate the disaster