|
Facebook & Twitter
Tags
Aliens, Carl Sagan, Cosmos, Life, Miscellaneous, People, Science, Science & Technology, Scientists, Astronomy, Politics & Society, Know something about this post? Email us |
|
|
Statistically and biologically there is life elsewhere, and if it's likely to want to destroy us, then this type of project should surely come out of a defence budget... and a world defence budget. Seti costs $2.5m per year to run, split between the superpowers, this could be next to nothing relative to other projects and expenses. Having said that, isn't this NASA's job?
ReplyVote up (6)down (1)Spam?
|
|
Guest: (703 days ago)
Latest comment: The way we're poisoning the seas, clear cutting rain forests, polluting the skies and increasing in numbers like a virus, the surest sign of intelligent life on other planets is that none if it has tried to contact us so far.
ReplyVote up (4)down (1)Spam?
|
|
Guest: Argle
(703 days ago)
One locust doesn't eat much. The sky filled with them destroys whole farms. Sure, it's just a little to fund SETI, but it's just a little to fund 1 million other wasteful projects, and little is more pointless than SETI.
FollowReplyVote up (4)down (4)Spam?
|
|
If/when we discover life elsewhere, then that's a pretty big nail in the coffin of religion. That alone would pay for itself many times over in making the world a less hate-filled place to inhabit.
ReplyVote updownSpam?
|
MGID (opens in new window)
Related Posts
