FOLLOW BOREME
TAGS
<< Back to listing
Tar sands means game over for the planet!

Tar sands means game over for the planet!

(11:22) Bill McKibben of 350.org and Anthony Swift of the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC) join Thom Hartmann to discuss the recent oil spill in Arkansas and how this might affect the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will be 10x bigger than the Pegasus Pipeline that ruptured. 350.org

Share this post

You can comment as a guest, but registering gives you added benefits

Add your comment
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: iknowlessthanyoudo (1656 days ago)
Hey Jethro! We done struck oil in our front yard. Let's move to Beverly Hills. Dem Californicators don't let oil men stink up their state.
ReplyVote up (133)down (48)
Original comment
Hey Jethro! We done struck oil in our front yard. Let's move to Beverly Hills. Dem Californicators don't let oil men stink up their state.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
cengland0 cengland0 (1656 days ago)
He said that refined petroleum products is America's #1 export. That is incorrect. It is Machines and Engines at 205.2 billion. LINK On the other hand, oil is America's top imported item at 464.3 billion. LINK
Original comment
He said that refined petroleum products is America's #1 export. That is incorrect. It is Machines and Engines at 205.2 billion. LINK On the other hand, oil is America's top imported item at 464.3 billion. LINK
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
WalterEgo WalterEgo (1656 days ago)
Corporatism in full flow
Original comment
Corporatism in full flow
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1656 days ago)
"Game over for the planet ?" OH NO if we clean up the tar sands the earth will fly into a petulant rage and crash into the sun because that will teach them. yet more moonbat loonery from the watemelon eco fascists. what idiot posts this crap ?
Original comment
"Game over for the planet ?" OH NO if we clean up the tar sands the earth will fly into a petulant rage and crash into the sun because that will teach them. yet more moonbat loonery from the watemelon eco fascists. what idiot posts this crap ?
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: madder (1656 days ago)
The initial comment was "Game over for the climate" and was wrongly repeated by the interviewer as "for the planet". As for the rest of your post, what idiot writes your crap? Oh, it's you.
Original comment
The initial comment was "Game over for the climate" and was wrongly repeated by the interviewer as "for the planet". As for the rest of your post, what idiot writes your crap? Oh, it's you.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1656 days ago)
dear madder, note if you look up you will see "tar sands means game over for the planet" written in bold letters. either you cant read or you are suffering from a logic failure. you must be walter posting under a pseudonym because there cant be two people that stupid.
Original comment
dear madder, note if you look up you will see "tar sands means game over for the planet" written in bold letters. either you cant read or you are suffering from a logic failure. you must be walter posting under a pseudonym because there cant be two people that stupid.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: madder (1655 days ago)
Dear mad, please point out the "logic failure" you refer to. I restate, the initial comment was "Game over for the climate" and was wrongly repeated by the interviewer as "for the planet". The fact that a Boreme editor titled it as "for the planet" doesn't invalidate my comment. Also, if you're going to post about people being stupid, you should try to grasp the difference between "cant" and "can't". "Can't" uses an apostrophe to show it's the shortened version of "cannot". "Cant" is what you talk.
Original comment
Dear mad, please point out the "logic failure" you refer to. I restate, the initial comment was "Game over for the climate" and was wrongly repeated by the interviewer as "for the planet". The fact that a Boreme editor titled it as "for the planet" doesn't invalidate my comment. Also, if you're going to post about people being stupid, you should try to grasp the difference between "cant" and "can't". "Can't" uses an apostrophe to show it's the shortened version of "cannot". "Cant" is what you talk.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1655 days ago)
dear madder/walter, I would have thought that to a NORMAL person the word "written""and the phrase "either you can't read " might be a bit of a giveaway to the fact i might be referring to a written phrase. im sorry if your so easily confused. Btw thanks for the correction on the grammer, a NORMAL person would have let it go. bye walter
Original comment
dear madder/walter, I would have thought that to a NORMAL person the word "written""and the phrase "either you can't read " might be a bit of a giveaway to the fact i might be referring to a written phrase. im sorry if your so easily confused. Btw thanks for the correction on the grammer, a NORMAL person would have let it go. bye walter
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: madder (1655 days ago)
Dear mad. As you didn't let it go, I guess you're not NORMAL. Btw I realise capitalisation and apostrophes could be a bit advanced for you - but you really should be able to spell "grammar".
Original comment
Dear mad. As you didn't let it go, I guess you're not NORMAL. Btw I realise capitalisation and apostrophes could be a bit advanced for you - but you really should be able to spell "grammar".
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1655 days ago)
dear walter well spotted again, little tip when trying to insult someone its always best to come up with something original, reusing one just used against you shows a lack of intelligence. tootle pip
Original comment
dear walter well spotted again, little tip when trying to insult someone its always best to come up with something original, reusing one just used against you shows a lack of intelligence. tootle pip
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: madder (1654 days ago)
Dear mad. I'm sorry you thought I was trying to insult you. It would be unfair to do that to someone of your patent calibre. My only intention was to use your own argument self-referentially to illustrate its inherent inconsistencies. Have a nice day, now.
ReplyVote up (61)down (123)
Original comment
Dear mad. I'm sorry you thought I was trying to insult you. It would be unfair to do that to someone of your patent calibre. My only intention was to use your own argument self-referentially to illustrate its inherent inconsistencies. Have a nice day, now.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1654 days ago)
dear walter, wit is spontaneous, you are 20 hours too late with your reply. "self-referential"? "inhererent consistencies"?. did you spend the whole night with your head in a dictionary .oh dear ha ha ha .
Original comment
dear walter, wit is spontaneous, you are 20 hours too late with your reply. "self-referential"? "inhererent consistencies"?. did you spend the whole night with your head in a dictionary .oh dear ha ha ha .
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: madder (1654 days ago)
Dear mad. It's only "too late" in your own mind: there is no time limit on replies. I don't spend as much time as you on Boreme as I have a life beyond posting ill-written insults (and let me be explicit that it's you to whom I'm referring.) It might take you you a whole night with a dictionary to come up with long words, but you should not project your own limitations onto others. Btw "consistencies" is the opposite of "inconsistencies" (which was the word I used). If you pay more attention you'll make fewer mistakes. Just a "heads up" here: I'm about to go out now so your undoubtedly prompt response will go unanswered for a while. It doesn't mean I've stopped caring about pointing out your errors, just that I have a life.
Original comment
Dear mad. It's only "too late" in your own mind: there is no time limit on replies. I don't spend as much time as you on Boreme as I have a life beyond posting ill-written insults (and let me be explicit that it's you to whom I'm referring.) It might take you you a whole night with a dictionary to come up with long words, but you should not project your own limitations onto others. Btw "consistencies" is the opposite of "inconsistencies" (which was the word I used). If you pay more attention you'll make fewer mistakes. Just a "heads up" here: I'm about to go out now so your undoubtedly prompt response will go unanswered for a while. It doesn't mean I've stopped caring about pointing out your errors, just that I have a life.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1654 days ago)
Latest comment: dear walter, nice tantrum ha ha ha, go back to your echo chamber and cry
Original comment
Latest comment: dear walter, nice tantrum ha ha ha, go back to your echo chamber and cry
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1655 days ago)
btw there are reports that the spill started with an explosion which would suggest it could be sabotage. it will take time for the metallugy analysis of the fault but i wouldnt rule it out
Original comment
btw there are reports that the spill started with an explosion which would suggest it could be sabotage. it will take time for the metallugy analysis of the fault but i wouldnt rule it out
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
RELATED POSTS
Gwyneth Paltrow on Harvey Weinstein (1998)
Gwyneth Paltrow on Harvey Weinstein (1998)
TYT - Does Trump have Alzheimer's?
TYT - Does Trump have Alzheimer's?
TYT - One of the worst wildfires in California history
TYT - One of the worst wildfires in California history
RoF - Trump wants 10x more nukes at his disposal
RoF - Trump wants 10x more nukes at his disposal
Seth Meyers - Harvey Weinstein, Donald Trump and systemic sexism
Seth Meyers - Harvey Weinstein, Donald Trump and systemic sexism