FOLLOW BOREME
TAGS
<< Back to listing
Evacuated tube transportation, space travel on Earth?

Evacuated tube transportation, space travel on Earth?

(9:25) Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku has classified the progress of civilisation into three stages - Type 0 to Type 3 (link). Currently we are firmly a Type 0 civilisation, and remain so while we are still burning fossil fuels as our main source of energy. In terms of transportation, a Type 1 civilisation will use air-resistance free vacuum tubes to propel passengers around the world at many thousands of miles an hour.

Share this post

You can comment as a guest, but registering gives you added benefits

Add your comment
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
WalterEgo WalterEgo (1601 days ago)
We should scrap HS2, put half the money in modernising Britain's current rail sytem and broadband, while investing the rest in ET3 research and technology. Time to shift our asses and move pronto into the future!
ReplyVote up (162)down (139)
Original comment
We should scrap HS2, put half the money in modernising Britain's current rail sytem and broadband, while investing the rest in ET3 research and technology. Time to shift our asses and move pronto into the future!
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Kamikaze (1597 days ago)
Latest comment: The kind of "international backbone" he talks about can never happen as long as there's political instability. Can you imagine a more natural target for terrorists? It's a beautiful idea, but think of all the problems with Air travel and terrorism, and this would be far more difficult to implement any kind of moderately effective security measures. Travel cross-country in 45 minutes, but spend three days getting through security first...
ReplyVote up (154)down (155)
Original comment
Latest comment: The kind of "international backbone" he talks about can never happen as long as there's political instability. Can you imagine a more natural target for terrorists? It's a beautiful idea, but think of all the problems with Air travel and terrorism, and this would be far more difficult to implement any kind of moderately effective security measures. Travel cross-country in 45 minutes, but spend three days getting through security first...
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (1601 days ago)
If ETT is comparable to the London Underground, I hope it's not like the Northern Line
ReplyVote up (165)down (176)
Original comment
If ETT is comparable to the London Underground, I hope it's not like the Northern Line
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1601 days ago)
fraction of the cost of an airline ticket? That's the point you lost me. Amortise the cost of building a global ET3 transport network over its lifespan (realistically 40-50 years) and I'm pretty sure that the cost is going to be more than that of a flight with Easyjet.
ReplyVote up (151)down (198)
Original comment
fraction of the cost of an airline ticket? That's the point you lost me. Amortise the cost of building a global ET3 transport network over its lifespan (realistically 40-50 years) and I'm pretty sure that the cost is going to be more than that of a flight with Easyjet.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
WalterEgo WalterEgo (1600 days ago)
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion so quick. Compared to an airline, the system would transport many more people. The 'fuel' costs would be minute in comparison to flying an aeroplane, and the service is not affected by weather. As for the cost of the infrastructure, I'm no expert but it is economically viable to build pipelines that crisscross the world to transport oil.
ReplyVote up (150)down (157)
Original comment
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion so quick. Compared to an airline, the system would transport many more people. The 'fuel' costs would be minute in comparison to flying an aeroplane, and the service is not affected by weather. As for the cost of the infrastructure, I'm no expert but it is economically viable to build pipelines that crisscross the world to transport oil.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1597 days ago)
supercooling a maglev vacuum pipe across those sort of distances would require enormous amounts of energy, not sure where the fuel savings come in there. Oil pipelines are a million miles from the sort of technology required here.
ReplyVote up (184)down (135)
Original comment
supercooling a maglev vacuum pipe across those sort of distances would require enormous amounts of energy, not sure where the fuel savings come in there. Oil pipelines are a million miles from the sort of technology required here.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: mad (1597 days ago)
not to mention the problems arising if superconductivity is lost (too high a current/magnetic field or temperature)
ReplyVote up (146)down (140)
Original comment
not to mention the problems arising if superconductivity is lost (too high a current/magnetic field or temperature)
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
RELATED POSTS
Tesla's semi truck, what we know so far
Tesla's semi truck, what we know so far
Can a passenger land a commercial airliner?
Can a passenger land a commercial airliner?
Vladimir Putin on electric cars
Vladimir Putin on electric cars
Will the shipping industry turn to wind power?
Will the shipping industry turn to wind power?
How big is Toyota?
How big is Toyota?