FOLLOW BOREME
TAGS
<< Back to listing
Trump announces FBI reopening of Hillary's email case

Trump announces FBI reopening of Hillary's email case

(3:05) The mother of October surprises. Donald Trump announced to a crowd of raucous supporters that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton's email server has been reopened. October 28, 2016.

Share this post

You can comment as a guest, but registering gives you added benefits

Add your comment
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (413 days ago)

This crowd is genuinely stupid. Not stupid as in foolish, stupid as in unintelligent or uneducated. There were even some people that specifically cheered when Trump said the two words "informing them".

It raises an important point. Let's assume Trump doesn't get in. These stupid people will still be in the USA. How does a country deal with that? With adults, it's too late to educate them, and that may not even be enough. Do the less stupid people have a responsibility to instigate laws to control the more stupid? Should they be entitled to simply try and manipulate stupid people to suit their own ends as Trump has done? How does any society ethically manage stupid people, particularly those who don't realise they are stupid? The thing is if every stupid person votes a certain way then they will outvote every one else. USA needs help on this.

ReplyVote up (101)down (87)
Original comment

This crowd is genuinely stupid. Not stupid as in foolish, stupid as in unintelligent or uneducated. There were even some people that specifically cheered when Trump said the two words "informing them".

It raises an important point. Let's assume Trump doesn't get in. These stupid people will still be in the USA. How does a country deal with that? With adults, it's too late to educate them, and that may not even be enough. Do the less stupid people have a responsibility to instigate laws to control the more stupid? Should they be entitled to simply try and manipulate stupid people to suit their own ends as Trump has done? How does any society ethically manage stupid people, particularly those who don't realise they are stupid? The thing is if every stupid person votes a certain way then they will outvote every one else. USA needs help on this.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (412 days ago)

Look up 'theory of mind'. Then grow up dumbfuck.

ReplyVote up (101)down (90)
Original comment

Look up 'theory of mind'. Then grow up dumbfuck.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (412 days ago)

Hark! One of those stupid-people-that-don 9;t-realise-it that I was telling you about. Hit a raw nerve, I guess.

Don't worry though. This one has Wikipedia which is almost good enough. Look up 'Dunning Kruger' while you're on there, sweetheart.

ReplyVote up (101)down (86)
Original comment

Hark! One of those stupid-people-that-don 9;t-realise-it that I was telling you about. Hit a raw nerve, I guess.

Don't worry though. This one has Wikipedia which is almost good enough. Look up 'Dunning Kruger' while you're on there, sweetheart.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (412 days ago)

Look up 'psychological projection' retard.

ReplyVote up (101)down (99)
Original comment

Look up 'psychological projection' retard.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (412 days ago)

That's it, let it all out. Look up 'acting out', silly billy.

But to be fair, I was wrong. It's never too late to educate yourself. So you failed at school, never got to college, and were socially excluded? Fine. There are other things beside Wikipedia, honey. Enrol onto an evening course. Read books. You don't have to stay uneducated and angry. Good luck to you.

(That's me managing a stupid person in an ethical way.)

ReplyVote up (99)down (101)
Original comment

That's it, let it all out. Look up 'acting out', silly billy.

But to be fair, I was wrong. It's never too late to educate yourself. So you failed at school, never got to college, and were socially excluded? Fine. There are other things beside Wikipedia, honey. Enrol onto an evening course. Read books. You don't have to stay uneducated and angry. Good luck to you.

(That's me managing a stupid person in an ethical way.)

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (412 days ago)

Do you not understand that you are telling me things about myself that you cannot possibly know?

So that tells me that what you're saying probably applies better to you than it does to me; that you are 'projecting' your insecurities onto me.

And that's what this whole presidential election is about - narcissism.

Your original comment was basically - 'these Trump supporters are not educated enough to be allowed to vote, what should we 'educated' people do about it?'. Force them to become eductated?

Thats sickening.

Anti Trump people (notice I haven't said Clinton supporters) are so riled up at his racism, sexism and rationalisations that hes a new 'Hitler' that they are reaching levels of intollerance similar to that seen in totalitarian regimes.

Personally I'm with Julian Assange on the election and don't understand why either candidate would want to position.

America seems like a high tech banana republic to me.

Maybe electing a president that is already under investigation is the only way to finally hold a president of the USA to account for their crimes?

ReplyVote up (70)down (101)
Original comment

Do you not understand that you are telling me things about myself that you cannot possibly know?

So that tells me that what you're saying probably applies better to you than it does to me; that you are 'projecting' your insecurities onto me.

And that's what this whole presidential election is about - narcissism.

Your original comment was basically - 'these Trump supporters are not educated enough to be allowed to vote, what should we 'educated' people do about it?'. Force them to become eductated?

Thats sickening.

Anti Trump people (notice I haven't said Clinton supporters) are so riled up at his racism, sexism and rationalisations that hes a new 'Hitler' that they are reaching levels of intollerance similar to that seen in totalitarian regimes.

Personally I'm with Julian Assange on the election and don't understand why either candidate would want to position.

America seems like a high tech banana republic to me.

Maybe electing a president that is already under investigation is the only way to finally hold a president of the USA to account for their crimes?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (410 days ago)

Do you not understand that people can believe things about you by deducing them from the things you do and say, without you telling them directly? Can you also understand that sometimes you (and others) may not be the best judge of your own personality traits?

For example, if I were to criticise people who use microwaves, and you replied with an extreme, volatile and aggressive response including a direct insult, then it's reasonable to infer that you are personally a microwave user and that you took personal offence... without you even telling me you use a microwave. So when I criticise people who are ignorant or uneducated, and you respond in just such a way, then I can make certain justified assumptions. You identify with the people you feel that I'm insulting, and therefore think a return insult is appropriate. Then if you continue to be highly aggressive and defensive, again, it seems to confirm that particular theory. If you continue to use simplistic playground insults without rationalising or addressing my points, again, I feel even more confident. I may be wrong of course, but so far you haven't given me any reason to think so.

No, I didn't suggest that anyone should be banned from voting, even if they are uneducated. If you re-read my original post, I merely posed several questions - you imagined your own answers, and was then offended by them. Superb.

And good one with your reductio ad nazism... if you are intolerant of totalitariansm, you must be totalitarian! Jesus wept.

I offer you my apologies for somewhere suggesting that we should educate people. Obviously in your ideal world, ignorance is never challenged, children are never schooled, and everyone can be lowered to your baseline. After-all, why can't everyone just use Wikipedia right?

Honeybunch, I am ignorant about many things, but I am not stupid, and really I've had too much education for my own good. It's made me arrogant, verbose and impractical. For sycophants that whoop whenever their leader says literally *anything*, and for those that get all "butt hurt" when I insult uneducated people and instantly start throwing around the type of insults I grew out when I was 13, I really doubt an excessive education is a problem they're suffering from. Let them eat cake.

ReplyVote up (101)down (83)
Original comment

Do you not understand that people can believe things about you by deducing them from the things you do and say, without you telling them directly? Can you also understand that sometimes you (and others) may not be the best judge of your own personality traits?

For example, if I were to criticise people who use microwaves, and you replied with an extreme, volatile and aggressive response including a direct insult, then it's reasonable to infer that you are personally a microwave user and that you took personal offence... without you even telling me you use a microwave. So when I criticise people who are ignorant or uneducated, and you respond in just such a way, then I can make certain justified assumptions. You identify with the people you feel that I'm insulting, and therefore think a return insult is appropriate. Then if you continue to be highly aggressive and defensive, again, it seems to confirm that particular theory. If you continue to use simplistic playground insults without rationalising or addressing my points, again, I feel even more confident. I may be wrong of course, but so far you haven't given me any reason to think so.

No, I didn't suggest that anyone should be banned from voting, even if they are uneducated. If you re-read my original post, I merely posed several questions - you imagined your own answers, and was then offended by them. Superb.

And good one with your reductio ad nazism... if you are intolerant of totalitariansm, you must be totalitarian! Jesus wept.

I offer you my apologies for somewhere suggesting that we should educate people. Obviously in your ideal world, ignorance is never challenged, children are never schooled, and everyone can be lowered to your baseline. After-all, why can't everyone just use Wikipedia right?

Honeybunch, I am ignorant about many things, but I am not stupid, and really I've had too much education for my own good. It's made me arrogant, verbose and impractical. For sycophants that whoop whenever their leader says literally *anything*, and for those that get all "butt hurt" when I insult uneducated people and instantly start throwing around the type of insults I grew out when I was 13, I really doubt an excessive education is a problem they're suffering from. Let them eat cake.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (409 days ago)

Wow, you took your time coming back with that response. A response that demonstrates that you are replying to the interpretation of what I wrote that you want to exist rather than an interpretation that more accurately reflects the key point I was making.

Stupid narcasistic American.

Just contemplate this:

Does Trumps intolerance justify intolerance of Trump?

Remember, remember the fifth of November, Gunpowder treason and plot.

America may be the greatest country in the world, but it isn't greater that the rest of the world.

You guys are sooo fucked!

ReplyVote up (99)down (101)
Original comment

Wow, you took your time coming back with that response. A response that demonstrates that you are replying to the interpretation of what I wrote that you want to exist rather than an interpretation that more accurately reflects the key point I was making.

Stupid narcasistic American.

Just contemplate this:

Does Trumps intolerance justify intolerance of Trump?

Remember, remember the fifth of November, Gunpowder treason and plot.

America may be the greatest country in the world, but it isn't greater that the rest of the world.

You guys are sooo fucked!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

Oh sweetie, I'm very sorry I took so long to reply. It must be awful being kept in such suspense. I must follow your lead and spend less time in real life, and more time getting all offended on BoreMe.

Ooh, "Does Trumps intolerance justify intolerance of Trump?". That's deep man - really deep. I loved contemplating that. Who knows? Does Hitlerz intolerance justify intolerance of Hitlerz? Does ISISeses intolerance justify intolerance of ISISes'z? Sheesh, too deep for me.

"A response that demonstrates that you are replying to the interpretation of what I wrote that you want to exist rather than an interpretation that more accurately reflects the key point I was making". Let me get this straight - I was responding to the interpretation of what you wrote that doesn't exist? Oh man, just one interpretation that doesn't exist, and that's the one I went and responded to? D'oh! Silly me. And it definitely doesn't exist, right? Heck, I hate always responding to the non-existent interpretation.

Well jeepers, I guess I may well be "narcasistic", but that wasn't what we were discussing. We were discussing whether you, and nigh-on half of all Americans, can be reasonably described as stupid, and / or uneducated, and how we can ethically manage those people. You have proved my first point far better than I ever could have. I'll take a wild stab in the dark and say you left school at 16, and by your defensiveness, you seem to now regret that. That's a start - maybe you're not one of the people that don't realise it after-all, hence you taking it so personally. Now don't get so hostile when someone recognises that - instead, change yourself. If you don't like what people see, change what they see instead of calling them the naughtiest words you can think of. Ask a responsible adult to help you.

Good luck from your friendly 'eductated', 'narcasistic', retard dumfuck.

ReplyVote up (101)down (87)
Original comment

Oh sweetie, I'm very sorry I took so long to reply. It must be awful being kept in such suspense. I must follow your lead and spend less time in real life, and more time getting all offended on BoreMe.

Ooh, "Does Trumps intolerance justify intolerance of Trump?". That's deep man - really deep. I loved contemplating that. Who knows? Does Hitlerz intolerance justify intolerance of Hitlerz? Does ISISeses intolerance justify intolerance of ISISes'z? Sheesh, too deep for me.

"A response that demonstrates that you are replying to the interpretation of what I wrote that you want to exist rather than an interpretation that more accurately reflects the key point I was making". Let me get this straight - I was responding to the interpretation of what you wrote that doesn't exist? Oh man, just one interpretation that doesn't exist, and that's the one I went and responded to? D'oh! Silly me. And it definitely doesn't exist, right? Heck, I hate always responding to the non-existent interpretation.

Well jeepers, I guess I may well be "narcasistic", but that wasn't what we were discussing. We were discussing whether you, and nigh-on half of all Americans, can be reasonably described as stupid, and / or uneducated, and how we can ethically manage those people. You have proved my first point far better than I ever could have. I'll take a wild stab in the dark and say you left school at 16, and by your defensiveness, you seem to now regret that. That's a start - maybe you're not one of the people that don't realise it after-all, hence you taking it so personally. Now don't get so hostile when someone recognises that - instead, change yourself. If you don't like what people see, change what they see instead of calling them the naughtiest words you can think of. Ask a responsible adult to help you.

Good luck from your friendly 'eductated', 'narcasistic', retard dumfuck.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

A sarcastic tone doesn't make you look intelligent, it just shows that you're spoilt, arrogant brat.

Anyway, I read the first paragraph of your response and decided whats the point. Crazy narcissists are always right. Forever blind to the reality that other people can see through them.

I look forward to watching you Americans further destroy your own country. It makes a change from you destroying other peoples countries.

ReplyVote up (101)down (83)
Original comment

A sarcastic tone doesn't make you look intelligent, it just shows that you're spoilt, arrogant brat.

Anyway, I read the first paragraph of your response and decided whats the point. Crazy narcissists are always right. Forever blind to the reality that other people can see through them.

I look forward to watching you Americans further destroy your own country. It makes a change from you destroying other peoples countries.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

Oh, and one more thing, seeing as you're a dumb **** arrogant American:

Russia, Syria and Iran have a defence pact between them (and by extension China because Russia and China have a defence pact) and because Hillary Clinton threatened to nuke Iran in 2008, if she wins it'll be WWIII - the entire world (except Saudi Arabia the US's only friend) against the US.

Have fun surviving a nuclear winter, that's if you and your family aren't burnt to a crisp you dumb, arrogant, spoilt **********************

ReplyVote up (101)down (77)
Original comment

Oh, and one more thing, seeing as you're a dumb **** arrogant American:

Russia, Syria and Iran have a defence pact between them (and by extension China because Russia and China have a defence pact) and because Hillary Clinton threatened to nuke Iran in 2008, if she wins it'll be WWIII - the entire world (except Saudi Arabia the US's only friend) against the US.

Have fun surviving a nuclear winter, that's if you and your family aren't burnt to a crisp you dumb, arrogant, spoilt **********************

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

Oh baby. You're really upset now aren't you? I don't use a sarcastic tone to look intelligent; I use reasoned arguments, grammar and spelling, and gratuitous esoteric qualifications. Have a go. No, the sarcasm thing is just for fun. But sure, sarcasm shows you're spoilt. Well I am spoilt in that my family valued an education (unlike yours, right? Not your fault, mate! Let it all out!) I was spoilt by an academic and ambitious (though not affluent) upbringing. That's why I feel a sense of duty to people in your position.

We could gather your lack of education and general ignorance from what you had already written, but do you really feel the need to expose your outright xenophobia too? I guess they often go hand-in-hand, but still. Just to rock your tiny world, I'm not American (as should be patently obvious from what I've been writing to anyone with a little intellect and world experience). But don't worry yourself about little details like that. I'm probably just responding to the non-existent interpretation again. Hehe!

Come on. Let it all out, honey. Act out. Act out. Don't read my paragraphs or try to address my points - god no! Just think of some more naughty words! That'll teach me how clever and urbane you are, and how you definitely didn't respond to this thread because you felt personally attacked. Bless your socks.

ReplyVote up (101)down (78)
Original comment

Oh baby. You're really upset now aren't you? I don't use a sarcastic tone to look intelligent; I use reasoned arguments, grammar and spelling, and gratuitous esoteric qualifications. Have a go. No, the sarcasm thing is just for fun. But sure, sarcasm shows you're spoilt. Well I am spoilt in that my family valued an education (unlike yours, right? Not your fault, mate! Let it all out!) I was spoilt by an academic and ambitious (though not affluent) upbringing. That's why I feel a sense of duty to people in your position.

We could gather your lack of education and general ignorance from what you had already written, but do you really feel the need to expose your outright xenophobia too? I guess they often go hand-in-hand, but still. Just to rock your tiny world, I'm not American (as should be patently obvious from what I've been writing to anyone with a little intellect and world experience). But don't worry yourself about little details like that. I'm probably just responding to the non-existent interpretation again. Hehe!

Come on. Let it all out, honey. Act out. Act out. Don't read my paragraphs or try to address my points - god no! Just think of some more naughty words! That'll teach me how clever and urbane you are, and how you definitely didn't respond to this thread because you felt personally attacked. Bless your socks.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

One last thing C U N T.

Your method of twisting and distorting arguments is why you get beaten up by your partners.

If you deliberately antagonise and psychological abuse your partners you get want you deserve.

An unlovable, narcissistic, entitled C U N T.

ReplyVote up (101)down (75)
Original comment

One last thing C U N T.

Your method of twisting and distorting arguments is why you get beaten up by your partners.

If you deliberately antagonise and psychological abuse your partners you get want you deserve.

An unlovable, narcissistic, entitled C U N T.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

I totally understand why you were offended when I criticised stupid and uneducated people. You've had so much teasing about your intellect in the real world, at least you could avoid it online, right? That's it, sweetheart. Release all that rage. Blame it all on me if you like. I'm the reason your family screwed you over and never supported you. I'm the reason you failed at school. I'm the reason you still write like a primary school pupil. I'm the reason you didn't learn and couldn't earn. I'm the reason your life is one long frustration. I'm the reason you won't pull your finger out and improve your life. Go on, have another drink why don't you, and tell me some more! Shame you've already used the very naughtiest word you could think of. You're doing really well at this acting out stuff. You must feel lighter. Keep it coming, honey. Release!

ReplyVote up (101)down (64)
Original comment

I totally understand why you were offended when I criticised stupid and uneducated people. You've had so much teasing about your intellect in the real world, at least you could avoid it online, right? That's it, sweetheart. Release all that rage. Blame it all on me if you like. I'm the reason your family screwed you over and never supported you. I'm the reason you failed at school. I'm the reason you still write like a primary school pupil. I'm the reason you didn't learn and couldn't earn. I'm the reason your life is one long frustration. I'm the reason you won't pull your finger out and improve your life. Go on, have another drink why don't you, and tell me some more! Shame you've already used the very naughtiest word you could think of. You're doing really well at this acting out stuff. You must feel lighter. Keep it coming, honey. Release!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

I don't think you understand what 'educated', 'logic', or 'reason' mean.

You skipped over 'theory of mind', 'projection' etc. and are now babbling nonsensically in the hope that something you say will protect your self image. It bet you're a nightmare to be around, trying to control your self image by manipulating others.

And everything you don't understand just doesn't exist does it? Too painful to accept the reality that you are below average intelligence and most people can't stand to be around you.

So you've taken a number of wellness and spirituality course and think that makes you 'educated' enough to sneer at others. Try taking an engineering degree or writing some software, you know actually contribute something to this world.

You dumb, narcissistic, pointless human being.

ReplyVote up (101)down (63)
Original comment

I don't think you understand what 'educated', 'logic', or 'reason' mean.

You skipped over 'theory of mind', 'projection' etc. and are now babbling nonsensically in the hope that something you say will protect your self image. It bet you're a nightmare to be around, trying to control your self image by manipulating others.

And everything you don't understand just doesn't exist does it? Too painful to accept the reality that you are below average intelligence and most people can't stand to be around you.

So you've taken a number of wellness and spirituality course and think that makes you 'educated' enough to sneer at others. Try taking an engineering degree or writing some software, you know actually contribute something to this world.

You dumb, narcissistic, pointless human being.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: HzL (407 days ago)

I'm getting confused and I'm not sure who is who - I am the original poster who has clearly upset you. The two line response to "It bet you're a nightmare to be around" wasn't actually me, but theirs was a valid point. It looks like I'm not the only person to enjoy baiting the less able, but personally, I think you're worth a little more in-depth ribbing, as follows.

You're right; I did skip over 'theory of mind', 'projection' etc. because when an undereducated grump starts plucking things from Wikipedia in an attempt to sound smart, when he's already identified himself with stupid and uneducated people, when he's more intent on flinging schoolyard insults, and when his writing style is literally lower than secondary level Literacy classes in the UK, I can't really take his armchair psychology too seriously.

An engineering degree? Who has an engineering degree? Honey, you can't just make stuff up and expect to be believed. Even less academic degrees like Engineering (even Electrical Engineering - ha ha) require a basic level of literacy and reasoning skills that, honestly, you don't show. I mean there's no way you have a GCSE grade C in English. And as for writing software - again, that is now taught in primary schools so I can almost believe that of you.

You're right, there is a difference between education and intelligence. This is what I mean - correct me if I'm wrong: A basic education, for example, might prevent you from mistaking adjectives with adverbs, might help you understand possessive apostrophes and contractions, might give you an understanding of the differences between British English and American English, might enable you to distinguish between sarcasm and condescension. Intelligence meanwhile, might enable you to analytically respond to particular points instead of getting flustered and saying rude words, might help you to tailor specific retorts rather than spewing out generic entries from Wikipedia that you think are clever; it might even allow you to realise what someone is criticising, and when you deny those traits, it would help you refrain from displaying them so clearly. See the difference?

I can see your frustration. Anyone who just constantly churns out silly insults when he feels threatened or offended is no credible discussion partner. The fact you can't hold your drink and exercise no self-control is further evidence for my theory. So, a xenophobe who throws around abuse when he feels down, who drinks too much on week-nights, who doesn't listen or follow arguments, who takes out a poor upbringing on everyone else, and has the maturity of 'winning' or 'losing' discussions. Are you sure it's me who's a nightmare to be around? No wonder you spend so much time here.

I won't expect another reply from you, but if you're clever and educated enough to think of yet another naughty word, I'll be all ears.

ReplyVote up (101)down (59)
Original comment

I'm getting confused and I'm not sure who is who - I am the original poster who has clearly upset you. The two line response to "It bet you're a nightmare to be around" wasn't actually me, but theirs was a valid point. It looks like I'm not the only person to enjoy baiting the less able, but personally, I think you're worth a little more in-depth ribbing, as follows.

You're right; I did skip over 'theory of mind', 'projection' etc. because when an undereducated grump starts plucking things from Wikipedia in an attempt to sound smart, when he's already identified himself with stupid and uneducated people, when he's more intent on flinging schoolyard insults, and when his writing style is literally lower than secondary level Literacy classes in the UK, I can't really take his armchair psychology too seriously.

An engineering degree? Who has an engineering degree? Honey, you can't just make stuff up and expect to be believed. Even less academic degrees like Engineering (even Electrical Engineering - ha ha) require a basic level of literacy and reasoning skills that, honestly, you don't show. I mean there's no way you have a GCSE grade C in English. And as for writing software - again, that is now taught in primary schools so I can almost believe that of you.

You're right, there is a difference between education and intelligence. This is what I mean - correct me if I'm wrong: A basic education, for example, might prevent you from mistaking adjectives with adverbs, might help you understand possessive apostrophes and contractions, might give you an understanding of the differences between British English and American English, might enable you to distinguish between sarcasm and condescension. Intelligence meanwhile, might enable you to analytically respond to particular points instead of getting flustered and saying rude words, might help you to tailor specific retorts rather than spewing out generic entries from Wikipedia that you think are clever; it might even allow you to realise what someone is criticising, and when you deny those traits, it would help you refrain from displaying them so clearly. See the difference?

I can see your frustration. Anyone who just constantly churns out silly insults when he feels threatened or offended is no credible discussion partner. The fact you can't hold your drink and exercise no self-control is further evidence for my theory. So, a xenophobe who throws around abuse when he feels down, who drinks too much on week-nights, who doesn't listen or follow arguments, who takes out a poor upbringing on everyone else, and has the maturity of 'winning' or 'losing' discussions. Are you sure it's me who's a nightmare to be around? No wonder you spend so much time here.

I won't expect another reply from you, but if you're clever and educated enough to think of yet another naughty word, I'll be all ears.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Let me remind you where this all began:

Do the less stupid people have a responsibility to instigate laws to control the more stupid?

And eventually you reveal that your qualifications are 'esoteric'.

So by your own assertion someone like myself with an engineering degree (software engineering) has the responsibility to control someone like you because I'm less stupid than you.

But the problem here isn't education or intelligence, it's psychopathology.

An inability to understand that you are projecting traits that you cannot bare to see in yourself onto others. And also some compulsive lying.

That's why I was hitting you with some information that might actually help you better understand what you were doing along side insults (admittedly I lost control myself at one point, but that's common when dealing with disturbed people, everyone has a snapping point).

I did this because I knew you would react the way you did and protect more of yourself onto me.

What I didn't realise is that you've completely lost the ability self reflect so therefore weren't able to recognise your own actions. Hence crazy narcissist.

Anyway, you've obviously fallen for the Trump and his supports are 'fascists' narrative, but if you look closer you will find that Obama and Clinton also share these same traits - Hillary threatening to nuke Iran in 2008, fabricating acusations peadophilia etc. Obama trying to shut down journalists (Wikileaks) and stiring up racial hatred (black lives matter) etc.

This will all become clearer over the next few weeks when Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Hillary Clinton etc. are arrest.

The propagnda used on you works because its playing on your prejudices against men, conservatives etc.

But when full blown narcissism is involved, like in your case, this is the true roots of fascism.

"The Fascists of the future will be the anti-fascists" - Winston Churchill.

You filthy fascist!

ReplyVote up (101)down (66)
Original comment

Let me remind you where this all began:

Do the less stupid people have a responsibility to instigate laws to control the more stupid?

And eventually you reveal that your qualifications are 'esoteric'.

So by your own assertion someone like myself with an engineering degree (software engineering) has the responsibility to control someone like you because I'm less stupid than you.

But the problem here isn't education or intelligence, it's psychopathology.

An inability to understand that you are projecting traits that you cannot bare to see in yourself onto others. And also some compulsive lying.

That's why I was hitting you with some information that might actually help you better understand what you were doing along side insults (admittedly I lost control myself at one point, but that's common when dealing with disturbed people, everyone has a snapping point).

I did this because I knew you would react the way you did and protect more of yourself onto me.

What I didn't realise is that you've completely lost the ability self reflect so therefore weren't able to recognise your own actions. Hence crazy narcissist.

Anyway, you've obviously fallen for the Trump and his supports are 'fascists' narrative, but if you look closer you will find that Obama and Clinton also share these same traits - Hillary threatening to nuke Iran in 2008, fabricating acusations peadophilia etc. Obama trying to shut down journalists (Wikileaks) and stiring up racial hatred (black lives matter) etc.

This will all become clearer over the next few weeks when Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Hillary Clinton etc. are arrest.

The propagnda used on you works because its playing on your prejudices against men, conservatives etc.

But when full blown narcissism is involved, like in your case, this is the true roots of fascism.

"The Fascists of the future will be the anti-fascists" - Winston Churchill.

You filthy fascist!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: HzL (407 days ago)

This is why it is worth me challenging people with little education; because eventually, they end up tempering their name-calling, even if it's by a single message. Of course, once you have had a jar or two, by the end of the evening your upbringing will shine through again. I can't wait.

As I said, IF (and it remains a big if) someone with your level of literacy and reasoning can get a degree in software engineering, then it says a lot about that course or its provider. I realise it's a bit of a joke subject, but did they accept naughty words instead of qualifications? Yes, I know there are plenty of Mickey Mouse institutes that accept Cs in GCSEs, and indeed there are some further education courses that seem to require no prior education at all, but still - being unable to use possessive apostrophes correctly without using a Word spell-checker is pretty damning. Ooh, but psychopathology ! You said psychopathology! My golly, you must be smart!

What you need to do is really think about the stuff you write before you click 'submit'. A few examples using your own words: You said "What I didn't realise is that you've completely lost the ability… (sic) self reflect." Forgetting the primary level mistakes, I'd draw your attention to your very first response which was "Look up 'theory of mind'. Then grow up dumbfuck." It seems at this point, your first comment, you had already decided that I didn't have the ability to self-reflect. So which is it? You knew from your first comment, or you didn't realise? Ooh tricky.

I'll give you another, just because I can. You complain about me "babbling nonsensically in the hope that something you say will protect your self image", when a few comments earlier you came out with the classic "A response that demonstrates that you are replying to the interpretation of what I wrote that you want to exist..." That's seriously the best example of babbling nonsensically to protect self-image that I've seen in a long time. No?

Can I give you another? Please, just one more. You complained about esoteric knowledge, concluding "So your (sic) brain dead. I see." But in your most recent comment you mentioned psychopathology (Ooh psychopathology !) So can I check; does having esoteric interests make you brain dead, or only if you actually study them? Does a Wikipedia interest in esoteric subjects mean you're really very clever and didn't have a disillusioned upbringing and shoddy education after-all?

So you see, this really isn't an argument with me; it's an argument with yourself and your own demons. You like to get offended about your own assumptions. I asked a rhetorical (look it up) question: "Do the less stupid people have a responsibility to instigate laws to control the more stupid?" You answered with the stunning "Force them to become eductated(sic)?", and then got all offended by your own answer; "Thats(sic) sickening". And now, because I have asked how we should ethically manage people of lesser ability, I am a totalitarian, I am a fascist! Talking of which, could you supply any sort of credible source for claiming that Churchill actually said "The Fascists of the future will be the anti-fascists"? It's a quote that's fairly widely discredited - it would take 2 minutes on Google, or Google books (without stepping foot in a library) to realise that. But tell me again how I believe "propagnda(sic)" ;. Once more, a charmingly foolish contradiction.

It must seem like mind-reading to you, but just from this single page, I can tell everything I need to know about your family background, your schooling, your career, your political standing, the newspapers you read, the TV you watch, why your most recent "abusive" partner left you (I know, psychic!). That's not because I'm smart. It's because you're not.

Well well. I wonder if I "won't receive another response" like you've said before. It's that old dilemma of yours - whether you can bravely accept a perceived insult, or whether you have to vent your emotions at the cost of directly contradicting yourself. Let's find out.

ReplyVote up (101)down (65)
Original comment

This is why it is worth me challenging people with little education; because eventually, they end up tempering their name-calling, even if it's by a single message. Of course, once you have had a jar or two, by the end of the evening your upbringing will shine through again. I can't wait.

As I said, IF (and it remains a big if) someone with your level of literacy and reasoning can get a degree in software engineering, then it says a lot about that course or its provider. I realise it's a bit of a joke subject, but did they accept naughty words instead of qualifications? Yes, I know there are plenty of Mickey Mouse institutes that accept Cs in GCSEs, and indeed there are some further education courses that seem to require no prior education at all, but still - being unable to use possessive apostrophes correctly without using a Word spell-checker is pretty damning. Ooh, but psychopathology ! You said psychopathology! My golly, you must be smart!

What you need to do is really think about the stuff you write before you click 'submit'. A few examples using your own words: You said "What I didn't realise is that you've completely lost the ability… (sic) self reflect." Forgetting the primary level mistakes, I'd draw your attention to your very first response which was "Look up 'theory of mind'. Then grow up dumbfuck." It seems at this point, your first comment, you had already decided that I didn't have the ability to self-reflect. So which is it? You knew from your first comment, or you didn't realise? Ooh tricky.

I'll give you another, just because I can. You complain about me "babbling nonsensically in the hope that something you say will protect your self image", when a few comments earlier you came out with the classic "A response that demonstrates that you are replying to the interpretation of what I wrote that you want to exist..." That's seriously the best example of babbling nonsensically to protect self-image that I've seen in a long time. No?

Can I give you another? Please, just one more. You complained about esoteric knowledge, concluding "So your (sic) brain dead. I see." But in your most recent comment you mentioned psychopathology (Ooh psychopathology !) So can I check; does having esoteric interests make you brain dead, or only if you actually study them? Does a Wikipedia interest in esoteric subjects mean you're really very clever and didn't have a disillusioned upbringing and shoddy education after-all?

So you see, this really isn't an argument with me; it's an argument with yourself and your own demons. You like to get offended about your own assumptions. I asked a rhetorical (look it up) question: "Do the less stupid people have a responsibility to instigate laws to control the more stupid?" You answered with the stunning "Force them to become eductated(sic)?", and then got all offended by your own answer; "Thats(sic) sickening". And now, because I have asked how we should ethically manage people of lesser ability, I am a totalitarian, I am a fascist! Talking of which, could you supply any sort of credible source for claiming that Churchill actually said "The Fascists of the future will be the anti-fascists"? It's a quote that's fairly widely discredited - it would take 2 minutes on Google, or Google books (without stepping foot in a library) to realise that. But tell me again how I believe "propagnda(sic)" ;. Once more, a charmingly foolish contradiction.

It must seem like mind-reading to you, but just from this single page, I can tell everything I need to know about your family background, your schooling, your career, your political standing, the newspapers you read, the TV you watch, why your most recent "abusive" partner left you (I know, psychic!). That's not because I'm smart. It's because you're not.

Well well. I wonder if I "won't receive another response" like you've said before. It's that old dilemma of yours - whether you can bravely accept a perceived insult, or whether you have to vent your emotions at the cost of directly contradicting yourself. Let's find out.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

I think you forgot to log out of the user account you where using elswhere. You really are a pscho crazy.

I think I'll just avoid eye contact and step away slowly...

Have a fun video: LINK

bye, bye nasdaq.

ReplyVote up (101)down (69)
Original comment

I think you forgot to log out of the user account you where using elswhere. You really are a pscho crazy.

I think I'll just avoid eye contact and step away slowly...

Have a fun video: LINK

bye, bye nasdaq.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: lurker (407 days ago)

Its not the same user anymore, you're being trolled man.

ReplyVote up (101)down (73)
Original comment

Its not the same user anymore, you're being trolled man.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Yeah I know. I think its the site admin pretending to be multiple users. Very sad, and very funny.

All you have to do is call him crazy and starts spewing irrational nonsense, yet he's so certain he's some super genius.

Sooo funny.

ReplyVote up (101)down (70)
Original comment

Yeah I know. I think its the site admin pretending to be multiple users. Very sad, and very funny.

All you have to do is call him crazy and starts spewing irrational nonsense, yet he's so certain he's some super genius.

Sooo funny.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Well this is new!

If I was really the site admin, do you think I wouldn't be able to spot you replying to yourself? Is that what they teach in Software Engineering class?

ReplyVote up (101)down (69)
Original comment

Well this is new!

If I was really the site admin, do you think I wouldn't be able to spot you replying to yourself? Is that what they teach in Software Engineering class?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Good guess crazy super narcissist, I guess your not female anymore? Can I have some more nonsensical word soup now please?

You know, where you tell me what a genius you are whilst acting like a toddler and making yourself look like an idiot.

And I am a software engineer. And your a mathematician, apparently Look, I can know things about you too. Except I'm right and your total numnut.

Haha!

ReplyVote up (101)down (74)
Original comment

Good guess crazy super narcissist, I guess your not female anymore? Can I have some more nonsensical word soup now please?

You know, where you tell me what a genius you are whilst acting like a toddler and making yourself look like an idiot.

And I am a software engineer. And your a mathematician, apparently Look, I can know things about you too. Except I'm right and your total numnut.

Haha!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Where (or were) did I say my female, or for that matter my male? And were (or where ) did I say I'm a genius? Were (or where) you assuming I am female by my pet names for you? Are (or our) you assuming I can't be female if I'm site admin (and able to see you replying to yourself)?

For your information, my NOT a mathematician, and my not a total numnut neither. Hence I can't count, but I can't use an apostrophe. What devilry is this?

And if a Software Engineer doesn't have any education in literacy and doesn't know the difference between "you're" and "your", and doesn't know that IP addresses make it easy to identify when someone is replying to themselves, and doesn't know that repeatedly contradicting himself confirms the theory he is a dunce, then OK... you can be a Software Engineer. Happy?

Hey, if I Wikipedia real hard, can I be a Software Engineer one day too?

ReplyVote up (101)down (70)
Original comment

Where (or were) did I say my female, or for that matter my male? And were (or where ) did I say I'm a genius? Were (or where) you assuming I am female by my pet names for you? Are (or our) you assuming I can't be female if I'm site admin (and able to see you replying to yourself)?

For your information, my NOT a mathematician, and my not a total numnut neither. Hence I can't count, but I can't use an apostrophe. What devilry is this?

And if a Software Engineer doesn't have any education in literacy and doesn't know the difference between "you're" and "your", and doesn't know that IP addresses make it easy to identify when someone is replying to themselves, and doesn't know that repeatedly contradicting himself confirms the theory he is a dunce, then OK... you can be a Software Engineer. Happy?

Hey, if I Wikipedia real hard, can I be a Software Engineer one day too?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Your tone earlier was female - sweetie etc.

And that had nothing to do with you being site admin, I just assumed that because I've come accoss a full blown narcissist thats obsessed with grammer and thinks that makes them super intelligent on this site before.

Since I'm a software engineer I'd know to use a proxy if replying to myself wouldn't I? Why don't you check?

I really can't believe you're arguing that I'm not a software engineer. You do realise this is a message board and theres no way to determine whether anything anyone says is true or not?

And the spelling mistakes you're referring to are called typos. I guess you're too perfect to make mistakes like typos? Or too narcissistic to ever admit it.

Man you're insufferable cretin. But it's so much fun when you lose it and start getting caught up in circular arguments and completely mssing the point. Just brilliant.

On a serious note: in what ways do you think you need to grow or change? Serious question.

ReplyVote up (101)down (74)
Original comment

Your tone earlier was female - sweetie etc.

And that had nothing to do with you being site admin, I just assumed that because I've come accoss a full blown narcissist thats obsessed with grammer and thinks that makes them super intelligent on this site before.

Since I'm a software engineer I'd know to use a proxy if replying to myself wouldn't I? Why don't you check?

I really can't believe you're arguing that I'm not a software engineer. You do realise this is a message board and theres no way to determine whether anything anyone says is true or not?

And the spelling mistakes you're referring to are called typos. I guess you're too perfect to make mistakes like typos? Or too narcissistic to ever admit it.

Man you're insufferable cretin. But it's so much fun when you lose it and start getting caught up in circular arguments and completely mssing the point. Just brilliant.

On a serious note: in what ways do you think you need to grow or change? Serious question.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: HzL (407 days ago)

Interesting gender stereotypes there. Further confirmation of your type of upbringing. What if I was gay? Or just deeply patronising? Or maybe I am female. You're going to have to make another assumption, and maybe get offended by it, sweetie. I'm amused by the fact that you can't even guess my gender or nationality - and yet I can tell every I need to know about you, your work history, your family circumstance. And before you call me "narcasistic" again, I repeat that's because you're not smart, not because I am. Anyone could do the same with someone as obtuse and transparent as you.

Read my latest comment again. I conceded that if entry requirements are incredibly low (even lower than one might expect them to be for such a non-academic subject) then yes, you could be a Software Engineer. I still find it unlikely. You just don't seem like graduate material - not even for courses like that where literally no real reflection or cognitive reasoning is required. But if you are, then I can safely say what an absolute joke of a course it must be. I know you probably wouldn't have to write essays, or read anything other than manuals, or really do anything academic for a course like that, but really, the bar needs to be raised. People are slipping through the net. Still, I have taught you some basic grammar and spelling - maybe if you're a real life Software Engineer you could teach me how to reboot my computer.

Oh TYPOS! I SEE! They were all typos! Brilliant! "Narcasistic" is a typo? "Your" (used repeatedly instead of you're, and vice versa) is a typo? If you had an education, you'd know how laughable that claim was. A typo might be when you hit the wrong key by accident. When you literally don't know how to use a common part of speech without spell-checker, you don't call that a typo, honey. When you tell me I am responding to "the interpretation that doesn't exist", you don't call that a typo. That's just low ability, but it's cute that you want to play it down. It shows you're embarrassed.

The only person who has lost it on this page is you, in more ways than way. You were absolutely spitting feathers, firing the word c*nt (and the rest) at me like it was going out of fashion. I knew at that point I had won. Then you failed to address any of my points, saying that my post was too long for that intelligent brain of yours. Then you said I was a troll and you'd never reply again - a proper little tantrum. And now you're back, claiming I am cross. What was that about self-reflection?

I feel I have spent too much time educating you of late. I realise you're used to staring at screens on your own for much of time, but I'm not. However, I feel I have made considerable progress with you - your last comment you didn't need to swear once! I'll take the credit. Decency is rubbing off. As obnoxious and arrogant as I can be, I don't think anyone reading (other than your alter-egos) is going to question why I'd claim you were undereducated and ignorant. It's been a tour-de-force of yours, from xenophobia to gender stereotypes, grammatical errors, bizarre nonsensical claims (the non-existent interpretation!), silly assumptions (American?), hilarious attempts to sound clever (ooh psychopathology !), a lack of basic comprehension, and furious repetitious crude insults. If you don't see that this is exactly what someone might expect of an undereducated ignorant troll, then that's your problem. As far as I'm concerned, I need offer no further evidence. It's been fun ribbing such a dope.

I rest my case.

ReplyVote up (101)down (71)
Original comment

Interesting gender stereotypes there. Further confirmation of your type of upbringing. What if I was gay? Or just deeply patronising? Or maybe I am female. You're going to have to make another assumption, and maybe get offended by it, sweetie. I'm amused by the fact that you can't even guess my gender or nationality - and yet I can tell every I need to know about you, your work history, your family circumstance. And before you call me "narcasistic" again, I repeat that's because you're not smart, not because I am. Anyone could do the same with someone as obtuse and transparent as you.

Read my latest comment again. I conceded that if entry requirements are incredibly low (even lower than one might expect them to be for such a non-academic subject) then yes, you could be a Software Engineer. I still find it unlikely. You just don't seem like graduate material - not even for courses like that where literally no real reflection or cognitive reasoning is required. But if you are, then I can safely say what an absolute joke of a course it must be. I know you probably wouldn't have to write essays, or read anything other than manuals, or really do anything academic for a course like that, but really, the bar needs to be raised. People are slipping through the net. Still, I have taught you some basic grammar and spelling - maybe if you're a real life Software Engineer you could teach me how to reboot my computer.

Oh TYPOS! I SEE! They were all typos! Brilliant! "Narcasistic" is a typo? "Your" (used repeatedly instead of you're, and vice versa) is a typo? If you had an education, you'd know how laughable that claim was. A typo might be when you hit the wrong key by accident. When you literally don't know how to use a common part of speech without spell-checker, you don't call that a typo, honey. When you tell me I am responding to "the interpretation that doesn't exist", you don't call that a typo. That's just low ability, but it's cute that you want to play it down. It shows you're embarrassed.

The only person who has lost it on this page is you, in more ways than way. You were absolutely spitting feathers, firing the word c*nt (and the rest) at me like it was going out of fashion. I knew at that point I had won. Then you failed to address any of my points, saying that my post was too long for that intelligent brain of yours. Then you said I was a troll and you'd never reply again - a proper little tantrum. And now you're back, claiming I am cross. What was that about self-reflection?

I feel I have spent too much time educating you of late. I realise you're used to staring at screens on your own for much of time, but I'm not. However, I feel I have made considerable progress with you - your last comment you didn't need to swear once! I'll take the credit. Decency is rubbing off. As obnoxious and arrogant as I can be, I don't think anyone reading (other than your alter-egos) is going to question why I'd claim you were undereducated and ignorant. It's been a tour-de-force of yours, from xenophobia to gender stereotypes, grammatical errors, bizarre nonsensical claims (the non-existent interpretation!), silly assumptions (American?), hilarious attempts to sound clever (ooh psychopathology !), a lack of basic comprehension, and furious repetitious crude insults. If you don't see that this is exactly what someone might expect of an undereducated ignorant troll, then that's your problem. As far as I'm concerned, I need offer no further evidence. It's been fun ribbing such a dope.

I rest my case.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (406 days ago)
Latest comment:

Retard.

ReplyVote up (101)down (79)
Original comment
Latest comment:

Retard.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Haha! You couldn't resist. You're a hoot. Excellent. Contradicting yourself is nothing compared to not venting, right?

WHOOP WHOOP!

"... the user account you where using elswhere. You really are a pscho crazy."

YAY! We're in the "Can't hold your drink" time-zone! So tell us again how you won't reply?

Sorry. I don't mean to bait you. I'm just pscho. Totally pscho, man. You and your psychopathology put me to shame; you totally refuted every point I made - you're practically a wizard. Like a really genius smart wizard with extra smart thinking powers of clever thinking and smartness AND Wikipedia special powers. I am humbled. I hope that one day I may climb the mountain of enlightenment and study the noble Software Engineering to become as smart as you.

Thanks for the laughs, Gormless.

ReplyVote up (101)down (83)
Original comment

Haha! You couldn't resist. You're a hoot. Excellent. Contradicting yourself is nothing compared to not venting, right?

WHOOP WHOOP!

"... the user account you where using elswhere. You really are a pscho crazy."

YAY! We're in the "Can't hold your drink" time-zone! So tell us again how you won't reply?

Sorry. I don't mean to bait you. I'm just pscho. Totally pscho, man. You and your psychopathology put me to shame; you totally refuted every point I made - you're practically a wizard. Like a really genius smart wizard with extra smart thinking powers of clever thinking and smartness AND Wikipedia special powers. I am humbled. I hope that one day I may climb the mountain of enlightenment and study the noble Software Engineering to become as smart as you.

Thanks for the laughs, Gormless.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

My pleasure crazy super pscho ;)

ReplyVote up (96)down (101)
Original comment

My pleasure crazy super pscho ;)

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

TLDR;

ReplyVote up (99)down (101)
Original comment

TLDR;

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

QED.

TY.

XD.

ReplyVote up (101)down (98)
Original comment

QED.

TY.

XD.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

One last post, culd resist...

It must seem like mind-reading to you, but just from this single page, I can tell everything I need to know about your family background, your schooling, your career, your political standing, the newspapers you read, the TV you watch, why your most recent "abusive" partner left you (I know, psychic!). That's not because I'm smart. It's because you're not.

No, you're just batshit insane.

ReplyVote up (93)down (101)
Original comment

One last post, culd resist...

It must seem like mind-reading to you, but just from this single page, I can tell everything I need to know about your family background, your schooling, your career, your political standing, the newspapers you read, the TV you watch, why your most recent "abusive" partner left you (I know, psychic!). That's not because I'm smart. It's because you're not.

No, you're just batshit insane.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

software engineering PMSL!!!!

ReplyVote up (99)down (101)
Original comment

software engineering PMSL!!!!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

Why don't you try testing me on it?

Lets see who has the responsibility, as you said, to control or manipulate who (alhough I've already manipulated someone more stupid than myself anyway).

Like I said in the beginning - grow up ***************

ReplyVote up (101)down (99)
Original comment

Why don't you try testing me on it?

Lets see who has the responsibility, as you said, to control or manipulate who (alhough I've already manipulated someone more stupid than myself anyway).

Like I said in the beginning - grow up ***************

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

"It bet you're a nightmare to be around,"?

What bet I'm a nightmare to be around?.

ReplyVote up (101)down (95)
Original comment

"It bet you're a nightmare to be around,"?

What bet I'm a nightmare to be around?.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

/facepalm.

You're friends are betting that you're a nightmare to be around.

Sooo funny. Sooo dumb. Sooo pointless.

Bye troll (hint: that means you won't get another response).

ReplyVote up (101)down (94)
Original comment

/facepalm.

You're friends are betting that you're a nightmare to be around.

Sooo funny. Sooo dumb. Sooo pointless.

Bye troll (hint: that means you won't get another response).

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (407 days ago)

I win then sweetie. Typical American - no stamina.

ReplyVote up (101)down (94)
Original comment

I win then sweetie. Typical American - no stamina.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

Such a C U N T. Sure your not American. Lying C U N T.

ReplyVote up (101)down (88)
Original comment

Such a C U N T. Sure your not American. Lying C U N T.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

gratuitous esoteric qualifications ???

So your brain dead. I see.

ReplyVote up (101)down (91)
Original comment

gratuitous esoteric qualifications ???

So your brain dead. I see.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

My what?

ReplyVote up (101)down (84)
Original comment

My what?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (408 days ago)

Typo, should've been: you're braindead, as in all you've ever done education wise is memorise stuff.

There's a difference between education and intelligence.

What a surprise you couldn't figure that out.

ReplyVote up (101)down (89)
Original comment

Typo, should've been: you're braindead, as in all you've ever done education wise is memorise stuff.

There's a difference between education and intelligence.

What a surprise you couldn't figure that out.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
RELATED POSTS
Who lied most, Trump or Obama?
Who lied most, Trump or Obama?
Donald Trump lists his friends
Donald Trump lists his friends
TYT - You won't believe how much TV Trump watches
TYT - You won't believe how much TV Trump watches
Things that go
Things that go "bing" in the mind of Donald Trump
Democracy Now! - The dangerous case of Donald Trump
Democracy Now! - The dangerous case of Donald Trump