FOLLOW BOREME
TAGS
<< Back to listing
Guy McPherson: Human extinction within 10 years

Guy McPherson: Human extinction within 10 years

(10:10) "I can't imagine there will be a human on the planet in 10 years" says climate scientist at the University of Arizona, Guy McPherson.

Share this post

You can comment as a guest, but registering gives you added benefits

Add your comment
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
guest123456789 guest123456789 (345 days ago)

Guy McPherson is such a quack. I will gamble $1,000,000 dollars that he's wrong. Anybody take me up on that deal? If humans are around in 10 years, you owe me a million US dollars. If all humans are gone in 10 years, I will give you a million US dollars.

ReplyVote up (101)down (98)
Original comment

Guy McPherson is such a quack. I will gamble $1,000,000 dollars that he's wrong. Anybody take me up on that deal? If humans are around in 10 years, you owe me a million US dollars. If all humans are gone in 10 years, I will give you a million US dollars.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (345 days ago)

Haha, heads I win, tails you lose. Made my day

ReplyVote up (101)down (88)
Original comment

Haha, heads I win, tails you lose. Made my day

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Tsuki Tsuki (342 days ago)

If humans are gone in 10 years time, can you please tell me where all the Sheba is hidden. Thanks in advance, but don't leave it too late.

ReplyVote up (101)down (94)
Original comment

If humans are gone in 10 years time, can you please tell me where all the Sheba is hidden. Thanks in advance, but don't leave it too late.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: the one and only MAD (342 days ago)

Typical libtard reasoning. The flaw that you haven't spotted is that we don't know you will have ten thosuand dollars in 10 years so even if we are not still here you probably wouldnt't be able to pay anyway. Flawed logic! I can tell you didn't have a degree. I bet you think climate change is man made too? Poor triggered libtard

ReplyVote up (101)down (96)
Original comment

Typical libtard reasoning. The flaw that you haven't spotted is that we don't know you will have ten thosuand dollars in 10 years so even if we are not still here you probably wouldnt't be able to pay anyway. Flawed logic! I can tell you didn't have a degree. I bet you think climate change is man made too? Poor triggered libtard

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: yee ha (342 days ago)

It appears a libturd is trying to besmirk my good name once again because he has been triggered and has lost again. Btw sadly for libtards this Alinsky tactic only serves to highlight the lack of education and gullible poltical thought process that one sees so oftentimes in the liberal noneducates and science illterates. If he could be bothered to look up temp cycles and Enso then he would learn I am right but no.... They cannot bring themself to do this as it undermines the liberal narrative of propaganda and fascism.

ReplyVote up (98)down (101)
Original comment

It appears a libturd is trying to besmirk my good name once again because he has been triggered and has lost again. Btw sadly for libtards this Alinsky tactic only serves to highlight the lack of education and gullible poltical thought process that one sees so oftentimes in the liberal noneducates and science illterates. If he could be bothered to look up temp cycles and Enso then he would learn I am right but no.... They cannot bring themself to do this as it undermines the liberal narrative of propaganda and fascism.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (342 days ago)

Besmirk! Haha you're priceless.

ReplyVote up (101)down (99)
Original comment

Besmirk! Haha you're priceless.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
WalterEgo WalterEgo (339 days ago)

Even I believe humans have more than 10 years left.

ReplyVote up (101)down (100)
Original comment

Even I believe humans have more than 10 years left.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
guest123456789 guest123456789 (339 days ago)

How much time do you think we have? You've stated before that global warming will keep every single species on this planet. But when?

ReplyVote up (92)down (101)
Original comment

How much time do you think we have? You've stated before that global warming will keep every single species on this planet. But when?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
guest123456789 guest123456789 (339 days ago)
Just noticed a typo. Should be kill, not keep.
ReplyVote up (101)down (94)
Original comment
Just noticed a typo. Should be kill, not keep.
Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
WalterEgo WalterEgo (339 days ago)
Latest comment:

I never said global warming will kill all life on Earth, I said it might.

How much time do we have? That depends on what we do. If we continue adding 40+ billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year, then I think this planet will be uninhabitable for humans by the end of this century, probably sooner.

ReplyVote up (88)down (101)
Original comment
Latest comment:

I never said global warming will kill all life on Earth, I said it might.

How much time do we have? That depends on what we do. If we continue adding 40+ billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year, then I think this planet will be uninhabitable for humans by the end of this century, probably sooner.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (345 days ago)

Not having watched the vid, I don't agree with the title. Humans are by far the most successful and adaptable large animals on the planet. I can't see us being wiped out unless it's a disaster that wipes out 99% of all species.

ReplyVote up (98)down (101)
Original comment

Not having watched the vid, I don't agree with the title. Humans are by far the most successful and adaptable large animals on the planet. I can't see us being wiped out unless it's a disaster that wipes out 99% of all species.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: yee ha (342 days ago)

You are wrong like a typical libtard. Do you get all your views off Alinsky?

The universe is cooling because of the Enzo and la nina and that will plunge us into the next cycle of ice age. I studied it for my degree in physics of science. Have you even been to the university?

No... btw there is no gas or no action Human kind can do to reverse this natural cycle. I have seen official satellite data that is available on the internet that is excellent evidence (not proofs) that the liberal elite propaganda machine are trying to surpress. I would share the data but i like to wind up libtards who always expect "evidence". They can do the research themselves like I did. Back to university libtards.

ReplyVote up (101)down (100)
Original comment

You are wrong like a typical libtard. Do you get all your views off Alinsky?

The universe is cooling because of the Enzo and la nina and that will plunge us into the next cycle of ice age. I studied it for my degree in physics of science. Have you even been to the university?

No... btw there is no gas or no action Human kind can do to reverse this natural cycle. I have seen official satellite data that is available on the internet that is excellent evidence (not proofs) that the liberal elite propaganda machine are trying to surpress. I would share the data but i like to wind up libtards who always expect "evidence". They can do the research themselves like I did. Back to university libtards.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (342 days ago)

Actually I was wrong, you're not smart enough to wonder whose herding you are you Trigger.

ReplyVote up (95)down (101)
Original comment

Actually I was wrong, you're not smart enough to wonder whose herding you are you Trigger.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Haa Haa (342 days ago)

That's right Triggered. You're often wrong. And yet I am still more educated and intelligent than you. In fact everyone on here is. Really. I know you don't realise that, but it's definitely true.

No one here is dumb enough to say things like 'Nullis in Verba' before refusing to show evidence for their second hand beliefs. No one else here is dumb enough to pretend to have a degree in physics, yet without the very basic grounding of an education either in science or literacy. No one else is so dumb, they pretend they are speaking to a supportive audience 'Look everyone', when it's obvious everyone else also realises you're a hysterical imbecile. No one else here is dumb enough to get so triggered that you reply to your own messages again and again in some drunken late night stupor, yet you still call other people triggered. No one else is so dumb that they have to try and turn a discussion about climate change into a grade-school shower of political insults, because they're out of their depth on anything scientific. No one else here is dumb enough to complain about propaganda, yet read Breitbart without fact checking a single word of it. No one but you, Triggered.

You are too dumb to be parodied. You are too dumb to be consistent. You are too dumb to see you contradict yourself. You are too dumb to realise literally everyone on here now knows you are a hopeless babbling dunce. You are so dumb I literally can't tell whether it's someone imitating your exceptional stupidity, or whether it's actually you. I swing between laugh-out-loud amusement, to face-slapping disbelief at what you write.

So congratulations, Triggered. You are officially the dumbest triggered terrified hypocritical troll to ever grace the comments of BoreMe. That's a Christmas Gift from us all. If I had your address I'd send you your first ever certificate.

I look forward to hearing how I'm a 'libtard' (standard brainwashed insult from Breitbart), and an Alinsky follower (standard brainwashed insult from Breitbart), and how 'triggered' I am.

ReplyVote up (98)down (101)
Original comment

That's right Triggered. You're often wrong. And yet I am still more educated and intelligent than you. In fact everyone on here is. Really. I know you don't realise that, but it's definitely true.

No one here is dumb enough to say things like 'Nullis in Verba' before refusing to show evidence for their second hand beliefs. No one else here is dumb enough to pretend to have a degree in physics, yet without the very basic grounding of an education either in science or literacy. No one else is so dumb, they pretend they are speaking to a supportive audience 'Look everyone', when it's obvious everyone else also realises you're a hysterical imbecile. No one else here is dumb enough to get so triggered that you reply to your own messages again and again in some drunken late night stupor, yet you still call other people triggered. No one else is so dumb that they have to try and turn a discussion about climate change into a grade-school shower of political insults, because they're out of their depth on anything scientific. No one else here is dumb enough to complain about propaganda, yet read Breitbart without fact checking a single word of it. No one but you, Triggered.

You are too dumb to be parodied. You are too dumb to be consistent. You are too dumb to see you contradict yourself. You are too dumb to realise literally everyone on here now knows you are a hopeless babbling dunce. You are so dumb I literally can't tell whether it's someone imitating your exceptional stupidity, or whether it's actually you. I swing between laugh-out-loud amusement, to face-slapping disbelief at what you write.

So congratulations, Triggered. You are officially the dumbest triggered terrified hypocritical troll to ever grace the comments of BoreMe. That's a Christmas Gift from us all. If I had your address I'd send you your first ever certificate.

I look forward to hearing how I'm a 'libtard' (standard brainwashed insult from Breitbart), and an Alinsky follower (standard brainwashed insult from Breitbart), and how 'triggered' I am.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (342 days ago)

And all this ranting from Trigger because I simply placed a fact in front of him destroying his entire argument (Current sea level rise rate is less than 1/4th of the MEAN average of the last 12,000 years).

All this alleged claimed intelligence goes to waste if it's not constrained by the FACTS, which is why the smart people fact check and learn to do rough order estimates.

Oh and as for Saul Alinsky, what can I say but he does exist,and his effect on American political tactics and the propaganda tactics of the liberal media is self evident, especially in the desperate attempts to stop Trump

Perhaps you can't stomach the fact that you are so easily bought and paraded around by the reins.

ReplyVote up (101)down (100)
Original comment

And all this ranting from Trigger because I simply placed a fact in front of him destroying his entire argument (Current sea level rise rate is less than 1/4th of the MEAN average of the last 12,000 years).

All this alleged claimed intelligence goes to waste if it's not constrained by the FACTS, which is why the smart people fact check and learn to do rough order estimates.

Oh and as for Saul Alinsky, what can I say but he does exist,and his effect on American political tactics and the propaganda tactics of the liberal media is self evident, especially in the desperate attempts to stop Trump

Perhaps you can't stomach the fact that you are so easily bought and paraded around by the reins.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (341 days ago)

Ok, Triggered (I'm assuming this one is you), please tell me where I put forward an argument about climate change. Go on, I'm all ears. Use my exact words.

You can't, because I haven't said anything about climate change. Not a word. All I did was to ask you to back up your second-hand opinions by sharing a link from the data you looked at. You couldn't do that because you haven't actually seen the data, and you didn't fact-check the article you read on Breitbart (and 'the smart people fact check' as you say!) Woops. Busted. Isn't that what a "libtard" would do? Fall for something their news told them without researching?

So now you are desperate to use any excuse and distraction method you can think of - Alinsky, Alinksy! - you cry - Liberal media! But at the end of the day, you regurgitated a theory from Breitbart that you just didn't check, and you want us to find the evidence that you couldn't. That isn't 'FACT' (not even in capitals), and it's about the least scientific way of presenting a theory that I can imagine. Physics degree? Oh please.

So no, Triggered, this isn't about my views, as everyone else here knows. This is about you being totally incapable of putting forward a rational scientifically supported argument, and when you're pressed to be logical or transparent about your sources, you have a little hissy fit and try to switch the focus onto politics, while digging up silly insults. You're out of your depth, sonny, but you just aren't sharp enough to realise it.

ReplyVote up (92)down (101)
Original comment

Ok, Triggered (I'm assuming this one is you), please tell me where I put forward an argument about climate change. Go on, I'm all ears. Use my exact words.

You can't, because I haven't said anything about climate change. Not a word. All I did was to ask you to back up your second-hand opinions by sharing a link from the data you looked at. You couldn't do that because you haven't actually seen the data, and you didn't fact-check the article you read on Breitbart (and 'the smart people fact check' as you say!) Woops. Busted. Isn't that what a "libtard" would do? Fall for something their news told them without researching?

So now you are desperate to use any excuse and distraction method you can think of - Alinsky, Alinksy! - you cry - Liberal media! But at the end of the day, you regurgitated a theory from Breitbart that you just didn't check, and you want us to find the evidence that you couldn't. That isn't 'FACT' (not even in capitals), and it's about the least scientific way of presenting a theory that I can imagine. Physics degree? Oh please.

So no, Triggered, this isn't about my views, as everyone else here knows. This is about you being totally incapable of putting forward a rational scientifically supported argument, and when you're pressed to be logical or transparent about your sources, you have a little hissy fit and try to switch the focus onto politics, while digging up silly insults. You're out of your depth, sonny, but you just aren't sharp enough to realise it.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (341 days ago)

In the Red pill corner

Scientific facts supported by the vast majority of scientists, eg Sea level rise during the Holocene,

In the Blue pill corner

Walter and Trigger, and all the purveyers of faux science disaster porn.

ReplyVote up (95)down (101)
Original comment

In the Red pill corner

Scientific facts supported by the vast majority of scientists, eg Sea level rise during the Holocene,

In the Blue pill corner

Walter and Trigger, and all the purveyers of faux science disaster porn.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (341 days ago)

Oh Triggered, now that is a surprise. I asked you directly for where I have shared my view on climate change, and you can't provide that either. But you still really want to argue with me. 'Faux science diaster porn' - seriously?

Hey, do you want another go? I'll pretend I didn't see your last comment. I ask you again; please quote me where I have said anything at all about my views on climate change. Go on. I dare you. This is your chance to expose my real views and if you disagree, correct them with your comprehensive scientific knowledge and specific data sources.

Don't stress. I know you can't. I just like watching you squirm. The fact remains that not only are you completely unaware of my actual views on the matter, but you are still entirely unable to supply evidence of your so-called 'scientific facts' (ie. whatever you read in Breitbart).

Hey, if this was anyone else, how would you respond to them basing an argument on assumptions about your position, and refusing to back any of it up with actual scientific data? Have a think - be honest with yourself. I'm sure you have some special insults for people like that. I know I do, but I doubt you'd understand them.

My conclusion, Triggered, is that you're either a comic character genius, or you really are spectacularly stupid. And I mean -wow- stupid, even by Breitbart standards. I'm really not sure any more. Perhaps you could elucidate, (whilst making a few presumptions about my political alliance and throwing in a few generic non-sequitur insults with your Alinsky obsession.)

ReplyVote up (101)down (95)
Original comment

Oh Triggered, now that is a surprise. I asked you directly for where I have shared my view on climate change, and you can't provide that either. But you still really want to argue with me. 'Faux science diaster porn' - seriously?

Hey, do you want another go? I'll pretend I didn't see your last comment. I ask you again; please quote me where I have said anything at all about my views on climate change. Go on. I dare you. This is your chance to expose my real views and if you disagree, correct them with your comprehensive scientific knowledge and specific data sources.

Don't stress. I know you can't. I just like watching you squirm. The fact remains that not only are you completely unaware of my actual views on the matter, but you are still entirely unable to supply evidence of your so-called 'scientific facts' (ie. whatever you read in Breitbart).

Hey, if this was anyone else, how would you respond to them basing an argument on assumptions about your position, and refusing to back any of it up with actual scientific data? Have a think - be honest with yourself. I'm sure you have some special insults for people like that. I know I do, but I doubt you'd understand them.

My conclusion, Triggered, is that you're either a comic character genius, or you really are spectacularly stupid. And I mean -wow- stupid, even by Breitbart standards. I'm really not sure any more. Perhaps you could elucidate, (whilst making a few presumptions about my political alliance and throwing in a few generic non-sequitur insults with your Alinsky obsession.)

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: lone ranger (341 days ago)

it is unfair, you keep asking him REALLY hard questions. no wonder he doesn't answer them. give him a break. i mean how is he supposed to know the views of the people he is arguing against? its way easier just to assume stuff and it saves time... and why should he have to provide evidence for what he has been told? he got it off the internet, thats all we need to know... its obvious a science fact if its on the internet. also if more people were like him and didn't look for the scientific sources then we would save money by employing less scientists. yes yes we need more people who don't question stuff. he is clearly a superior genius and i feel honored he posts here at all.

ReplyVote up (96)down (101)
Original comment

it is unfair, you keep asking him REALLY hard questions. no wonder he doesn't answer them. give him a break. i mean how is he supposed to know the views of the people he is arguing against? its way easier just to assume stuff and it saves time... and why should he have to provide evidence for what he has been told? he got it off the internet, thats all we need to know... its obvious a science fact if its on the internet. also if more people were like him and didn't look for the scientific sources then we would save money by employing less scientists. yes yes we need more people who don't question stuff. he is clearly a superior genius and i feel honored he posts here at all.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (341 days ago)

Goodness me Trigger.

You've dropped the Alinsky/ Breibart connection,Bit of a Rowback that, I guess you found the wealth of information and Interviews about him

Next thing ya now you'll be looking up the Enso (El Nino/Southern Oscillation) cycle, and find a wealth of information about that too,

ReplyVote up (91)down (101)
Original comment

Goodness me Trigger.

You've dropped the Alinsky/ Breibart connection,Bit of a Rowback that, I guess you found the wealth of information and Interviews about him

Next thing ya now you'll be looking up the Enso (El Nino/Southern Oscillation) cycle, and find a wealth of information about that too,

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (341 days ago)

Woopsy daisy, Triggered! It looks like you've forgotten to quote my views again, or back up yours.

One more try - ask a grown up to help you. Ready? Here we go!

Question 1: If you disagree with my views on climate change (and you seem to believe you do), quote me where I have shared them and tell me exactly where you disagree.

Question 2: If you have formed a rational opinion based on 'official satellite data' that you have seen, give me the link to the exact data you saw so I can see it too, and then I can make my own mind up.

Don't they seem like fair requests to you? Why are you so scared to address them? (These are what we call rhetorical questions, so you don't need to answer them.)

I mean honestly, I just can't dumb it down for you any further so just give them your best shot.

ReplyVote up (101)down (94)
Original comment

Woopsy daisy, Triggered! It looks like you've forgotten to quote my views again, or back up yours.

One more try - ask a grown up to help you. Ready? Here we go!

Question 1: If you disagree with my views on climate change (and you seem to believe you do), quote me where I have shared them and tell me exactly where you disagree.

Question 2: If you have formed a rational opinion based on 'official satellite data' that you have seen, give me the link to the exact data you saw so I can see it too, and then I can make my own mind up.

Don't they seem like fair requests to you? Why are you so scared to address them? (These are what we call rhetorical questions, so you don't need to answer them.)

I mean honestly, I just can't dumb it down for you any further so just give them your best shot.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (341 days ago)

I love chatting to libtards on boreme, Their inability to concede a point is legend. I know even if I was to post a link they still wouldn't concede. I've seen others post graphs in the past only for it to dismissed as "denier science", so I don't bother. Besides its better to simply tell them to just search for the relevant information on the official Met office Noaa and nasa sites. I also know that their intrangience is fuelled by the fact that they haven't got a clue what they are looking for, and wouldn't know what it meant even when place in front of them.

Besides I only popped over intially to see how thay were coping with the Trump election and Brexit

ReplyVote up (93)down (101)
Original comment

I love chatting to libtards on boreme, Their inability to concede a point is legend. I know even if I was to post a link they still wouldn't concede. I've seen others post graphs in the past only for it to dismissed as "denier science", so I don't bother. Besides its better to simply tell them to just search for the relevant information on the official Met office Noaa and nasa sites. I also know that their intrangience is fuelled by the fact that they haven't got a clue what they are looking for, and wouldn't know what it meant even when place in front of them.

Besides I only popped over intially to see how thay were coping with the Trump election and Brexit

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (341 days ago)

"Their inability to concede a point is legend."

Oh Jesus wept! That's freaking hilarious! I doff my hat to you, sir!

No attempt to answer either basic question? Haha! Oh wow. Well you know you've failed absolutely, on all fronts, and that's enough for me. I can't make it any more obvious to us all - that's why no one will ever take you seriously, OK? Anyway, it's good to see which 2 simple questions can absolutely flaw a Trump wingnut such as yourself; 1) what do your opponents actually believe, and 2) what evidence do you have for your own beliefs? Very telling.

You've converted my bewilderment and frustration, to pity and amusement. Thank you, Triggered, and bless your simple soul. I don't like to gloat, so I'll leave it at that. QED, and then some.

ReplyVote up (101)down (80)
Original comment

"Their inability to concede a point is legend."

Oh Jesus wept! That's freaking hilarious! I doff my hat to you, sir!

No attempt to answer either basic question? Haha! Oh wow. Well you know you've failed absolutely, on all fronts, and that's enough for me. I can't make it any more obvious to us all - that's why no one will ever take you seriously, OK? Anyway, it's good to see which 2 simple questions can absolutely flaw a Trump wingnut such as yourself; 1) what do your opponents actually believe, and 2) what evidence do you have for your own beliefs? Very telling.

You've converted my bewilderment and frustration, to pity and amusement. Thank you, Triggered, and bless your simple soul. I don't like to gloat, so I'll leave it at that. QED, and then some.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (341 days ago)

That's ok Trigger, It seems you are too backward to conduct an independant internet search,so my advice to you is to pop over to Skeptical science where they will fill you in with the 97% nonsensus and train you to treat all the science behind the Enso Cycle and Rossby waves as hate facts. That will keep the liberal bubble intact and functioning

ReplyVote up (92)down (101)
Original comment

That's ok Trigger, It seems you are too backward to conduct an independant internet search,so my advice to you is to pop over to Skeptical science where they will fill you in with the 97% nonsensus and train you to treat all the science behind the Enso Cycle and Rossby waves as hate facts. That will keep the liberal bubble intact and functioning

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (341 days ago)

hahaahaaaaaa triggerd you just got owned son!! pmsl

ReplyVote up (90)down (101)
Original comment

hahaahaaaaaa triggerd you just got owned son!! pmsl

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Bestertester Bestertester (342 days ago)

Exactly.

ReplyVote up (99)down (101)
Original comment

Exactly.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Fred34 (342 days ago)

The George Osborne of climate change - what a dickhead!

ReplyVote up (94)down (101)
Original comment

The George Osborne of climate change - what a dickhead!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
RELATED POSTS
Bernie Sanders - Trump's failure to act on climate change
Bernie Sanders - Trump's failure to act on climate change
How do climate scientists predict the future?
How do climate scientists predict the future?
Cows and climate change
Cows and climate change
The National - Climate change Q&A with Bob McDonald
The National - Climate change Q&A with Bob McDonald
China surpasses USA in renewable energy
China surpasses USA in renewable energy