FOLLOW BOREME
TAGS
<< Back to listing
Michelle Thaller on climate science denial

Michelle Thaller on climate science denial

(11:29) American astronomer and science educator Michelle Thaller defends her profession.

Share this post

You can comment as a guest, but registering gives you added benefits

Add your comment
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
zottek zottek (22 days ago)

It is very likely that there is more human misery than human happiness on earth. If that is true, it would be better to end the history of mankind as soon as possible. By the way, one day the sun will cool down - why is nobody concerned about that??

Original comment

It is very likely that there is more human misery than human happiness on earth. If that is true, it would be better to end the history of mankind as soon as possible. By the way, one day the sun will cool down - why is nobody concerned about that??

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

Because it will also expand and engulf the earth, which I guess is an more immediate problem

Original comment

Because it will also expand and engulf the earth, which I guess is an more immediate problem

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

Because it will also expand and engulf the earth, which I guess is an more immediate problem

Original comment

Because it will also expand and engulf the earth, which I guess is an more immediate problem

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Guesting (22 days ago)

Thanks to the Boreme editor for posting this video. Very good presentation.

(Some people will continue to lack the ability to lear from data, but that is a psychological and political problem. It is rather strange to see ignorant lay people claim to know more than the scientists in the field. No point in arguing with these people. "They are not interested in you telling you what the facts are.")

Original comment

Thanks to the Boreme editor for posting this video. Very good presentation.

(Some people will continue to lack the ability to lear from data, but that is a psychological and political problem. It is rather strange to see ignorant lay people claim to know more than the scientists in the field. No point in arguing with these people. "They are not interested in you telling you what the facts are.")

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (22 days ago)

Actually the "educator" in this clip is an astronomer. By your retard logic , she is less qualified than me.

Btw fun fact for Libtards, the science of astronomy was developed by astrologers.

Original comment

Actually the "educator" in this clip is an astronomer. By your retard logic , she is less qualified than me.

Btw fun fact for Libtards, the science of astronomy was developed by astrologers.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Guesting (19 days ago)

What?? "the science of astronomy was developed by astrologers."

Geeze... This guy knows how to twist things. He is so ridiculous.

Astronomy and astrology are related, but science dropped the astrology part. Anyone looking for more interesting cases of science emerging from non-science: take a look at medicine.

Original comment

What?? "the science of astronomy was developed by astrologers."

Geeze... This guy knows how to twist things. He is so ridiculous.

Astronomy and astrology are related, but science dropped the astrology part. Anyone looking for more interesting cases of science emerging from non-science: take a look at medicine.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (19 days ago)

Trying bit to hard aren't you. What's that word ... Triggered iwasnt it

Stupid retard

Original comment

Trying bit to hard aren't you. What's that word ... Triggered iwasnt it

Stupid retard

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

"Stupid retard"! LOL he's upset again! Guesting you are getting as good as Bob and triggering him. We should set up a championship

Original comment

"Stupid retard"! LOL he's upset again! Guesting you are getting as good as Bob and triggering him. We should set up a championship

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

And triggered again. What a retard eh

Original comment

And triggered again. What a retard eh

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

Yeah that's what I said, well done. We know you're upset. But can you tell us your thoughts on whether Bob or Guesting is the king at triggering you? Because they both seem to do it so easily.

Original comment

Yeah that's what I said, well done. We know you're upset. But can you tell us your thoughts on whether Bob or Guesting is the king at triggering you? Because they both seem to do it so easily.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

Yes cos I'm the one that keeps a list of arguments that I've apparently lost, based on imagined facts like a true obsessed mentally ill libtard.

That's makes me triggered apparently.

Original comment

Yes cos I'm the one that keeps a list of arguments that I've apparently lost, based on imagined facts like a true obsessed mentally ill libtard.

That's makes me triggered apparently.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

If you have a functioning memory, you don't need to keep a list. Can you imagine that? But no, that's not what shows us you're triggered. Replying multiple times to the same message, posting at all times of the day and night, and getting increasingly irate and insulting, gradually losing yet more of your writing composure - those things show us you're triggered. No offence, but it's kind of obvious.

Original comment

If you have a functioning memory, you don't need to keep a list. Can you imagine that? But no, that's not what shows us you're triggered. Replying multiple times to the same message, posting at all times of the day and night, and getting increasingly irate and insulting, gradually losing yet more of your writing composure - those things show us you're triggered. No offence, but it's kind of obvious.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

Adding a postscript ain't obsessive, stewing over old arguments is, and trying to change the facts to make yourself win definitely is.

Have fun trigger.

Original comment

Adding a postscript ain't obsessive, stewing over old arguments is, and trying to change the facts to make yourself win definitely is.

Have fun trigger.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (22 days ago)

Interesting change of propaganda emphasis, instead of climate CHANGE denial, it's now climate SCIENCE denial.

Ah well, still doesn't alter the fact that the climate models predict jack shit.and Hockey stick studies are statistical nonsense.

Original comment

Interesting change of propaganda emphasis, instead of climate CHANGE denial, it's now climate SCIENCE denial.

Ah well, still doesn't alter the fact that the climate models predict jack shit.and Hockey stick studies are statistical nonsense.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

Real Mad. Officially 'born yesterday'.

Original comment

Real Mad. Officially 'born yesterday'.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

You however are easily predictable, and the hockey stick describes your temper remarkably well.

Original comment

You however are easily predictable, and the hockey stick describes your temper remarkably well.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (22 days ago)

Why am i supposed to be angry ?.All I was commenting on is how the libtard propaganda attack has retreated from global warming denial via climate change denial to climate science denial..

The simple truth is that climate science is littered with failed predictions.

Pointing out the abject failures to match reality isn't denial.

Original comment

Why am i supposed to be angry ?.All I was commenting on is how the libtard propaganda attack has retreated from global warming denial via climate change denial to climate science denial..

The simple truth is that climate science is littered with failed predictions.

Pointing out the abject failures to match reality isn't denial.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

LOL Real Dumb has been triggered already just 2 messages in. Is that a record? In a minute he will be sending several replies to each message with increasing insults.

Original comment

LOL Real Dumb has been triggered already just 2 messages in. Is that a record? In a minute he will be sending several replies to each message with increasing insults.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (22 days ago)

I think you dying for me to be triggered, well I'm not, I'm laughing.The simple truth is, the idiot left assault on science is retreating and taking the loony end of "climate science" with it. When you have a ludicrous popinjay "science guy" leading the "march for science", then you know they're circling the drain.

Have a nice day, Libtard.

Original comment

I think you dying for me to be triggered, well I'm not, I'm laughing.The simple truth is, the idiot left assault on science is retreating and taking the loony end of "climate science" with it. When you have a ludicrous popinjay "science guy" leading the "march for science", then you know they're circling the drain.

Have a nice day, Libtard.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

OH wow here we go, yep definitely triggered... let's see, pretending to be laughing that's always a giveaway, then using his Mcdonalds catch phrase, plus idiot, loony, libtard, general insults! 100% triggered!! He needs to take a break.

Well done Bob (?) you triggered Real Tard in record time. On the next video lets see if you can do it with just 1 comment!! Bet you can.

Original comment

OH wow here we go, yep definitely triggered... let's see, pretending to be laughing that's always a giveaway, then using his Mcdonalds catch phrase, plus idiot, loony, libtard, general insults! 100% triggered!! He needs to take a break.

Well done Bob (?) you triggered Real Tard in record time. On the next video lets see if you can do it with just 1 comment!! Bet you can.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (22 days ago)

Ha ha ha ha ha ha . Ah well off out.

Original comment

Ha ha ha ha ha ha . Ah well off out.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (20 days ago)

Not me, guv. I was tidying the garden - but still shaking my head wondering why the "deniers" are so unwilling to follow the precautionary principle.

Original comment

Not me, guv. I was tidying the garden - but still shaking my head wondering why the "deniers" are so unwilling to follow the precautionary principle.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (20 days ago)

Bob, the precautionary principle should have you bowing in Allah, just in case, assuming of course you leave the house, which you shouldn't according to the precautionary principle.

Original comment

Bob, the precautionary principle should have you bowing in Allah, just in case, assuming of course you leave the house, which you shouldn't according to the precautionary principle.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (20 days ago)

"bowing in Allah" makes no sense.

Look up the precautionary principle (it's quite simple) then fail to explain why it applies to me leaving the house.

Don't expect any response from me straight away - I'm off out, so if Guest, Walter, Uncle Tom Cobbley posts it won't be me. Accept no substitute!

Original comment

"bowing in Allah" makes no sense.

Look up the precautionary principle (it's quite simple) then fail to explain why it applies to me leaving the house.

Don't expect any response from me straight away - I'm off out, so if Guest, Walter, Uncle Tom Cobbley posts it won't be me. Accept no substitute!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (20 days ago)

Nitpicking because you don't have a decent valid reposte ?

How normal for you Bob.

Original comment

Nitpicking because you don't have a decent valid reposte ?

How normal for you Bob.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Incidentally, the precautionary principle so beloved of Libtards is only one half of the equation known as risk assessment. It's a feature of libtarded thinking that they operate on only half the picture.

Original comment

Incidentally, the precautionary principle so beloved of Libtards is only one half of the equation known as risk assessment. It's a feature of libtarded thinking that they operate on only half the picture.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

You're offered to play Russian roulette with a revolver containing one bullet but an unknown number of chambers. Your local scientist does research in the field of revolver science for a living, and says the evidence suggests there's less than 50 chambers. Some fanatics on the Internet thinks there's only one chamber. You know the scientist has been wrong before, and the fanatics are all lunatics. There could be several billion chambers in your opinion, and maybe there isn't even a bullet. You get ten pounds and a bag of crisps for pulling the trigger. Would you play?

Original comment

You're offered to play Russian roulette with a revolver containing one bullet but an unknown number of chambers. Your local scientist does research in the field of revolver science for a living, and says the evidence suggests there's less than 50 chambers. Some fanatics on the Internet thinks there's only one chamber. You know the scientist has been wrong before, and the fanatics are all lunatics. There could be several billion chambers in your opinion, and maybe there isn't even a bullet. You get ten pounds and a bag of crisps for pulling the trigger. Would you play?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Yes that's a good example of the limited 1st order understanding of risk that fuels most libtard fantasies.

Well done libtard boy.

Original comment

Yes that's a good example of the limited 1st order understanding of risk that fuels most libtard fantasies.

Well done libtard boy.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Feel free to rewrite the analogy to fit your non-libtard understanding. That would actually be quite interesting.

Original comment

Feel free to rewrite the analogy to fit your non-libtard understanding. That would actually be quite interesting.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

In other words you can't answer the question?

OK fair enough.

Original comment

In other words you can't answer the question?

OK fair enough.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

I answered it in a way that you wouldn't understand, but an actuary would.

Original comment

I answered it in a way that you wouldn't understand, but an actuary would.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

It was a yes/no question and you failed to answer it, as usual. Good distractions though.

Original comment

It was a yes/no question and you failed to answer it, as usual. Good distractions though.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

It was a loaded question but you are too retarded to understand that.

Go and look up what an actuary does, retard boy.

Original comment

It was a loaded question but you are too retarded to understand that.

Go and look up what an actuary does, retard boy.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

There, there, boohoo. Don't get triggered so quickly.

It was a simple question but you couldn't understand it; you couldn't answer it. That's not uncommon for you. We've lowered our expectations, now you should try the same.

Original comment

There, there, boohoo. Don't get triggered so quickly.

It was a simple question but you couldn't understand it; you couldn't answer it. That's not uncommon for you. We've lowered our expectations, now you should try the same.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Poor anonymous guest. Too retarded to understand what a logical fallacy looks like.

Look them up retard boy.

Original comment

Poor anonymous guest. Too retarded to understand what a logical fallacy looks like.

Look them up retard boy.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Yes, we know you're angry, but really it's not your fault you can't answer a very simple hypothetical question. Of course, it invovles a little cognitive ability, and some imagination, neither of which you could relate to, but even a guess would be better than this tantrum.

Call me another rude word for a distraction. We haven't noticed at all.

Original comment

Yes, we know you're angry, but really it's not your fault you can't answer a very simple hypothetical question. Of course, it invovles a little cognitive ability, and some imagination, neither of which you could relate to, but even a guess would be better than this tantrum.

Call me another rude word for a distraction. We haven't noticed at all.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

I'm just laughing at you.

Btw where did you get that idiotic precautionary principle analogy ? Was it from some brainwashing site for undiscerning libtards like climate progress, cos it's shite.

Incidentally if you do want to educate yourself on climate impacts , then I suggest you research the work of Dr's Richard Tol, and Richard Betts, however be forewarned that they have been branded as Deniers, for not following the party line.

Have a nice day

Gee you're dumb.

Original comment

I'm just laughing at you.

Btw where did you get that idiotic precautionary principle analogy ? Was it from some brainwashing site for undiscerning libtards like climate progress, cos it's shite.

Incidentally if you do want to educate yourself on climate impacts , then I suggest you research the work of Dr's Richard Tol, and Richard Betts, however be forewarned that they have been branded as Deniers, for not following the party line.

Have a nice day

Gee you're dumb.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Still pretending to laugh? To use your word, triggered. You make it so obvious.

It's quaint you still think I'm Bob (who was the one schooling you on the precautionary principle). You really have no clue, bless your cotton socks.

Original comment

Still pretending to laugh? To use your word, triggered. You make it so obvious.

It's quaint you still think I'm Bob (who was the one schooling you on the precautionary principle). You really have no clue, bless your cotton socks.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Ha ha ha ha ha. Goodness me , I suspect you've been given a few good hidings in your day,.

I bet if someone gave you a good hard kick in the nadgers you would curl up into a ball screaming ". Har had, missed both my legs ".

Libtards are sure full of shit.

Have a nice day libtard.

Ps do look up those things I've mentioned, at least you could try to educate yourself.

Original comment

Ha ha ha ha ha. Goodness me , I suspect you've been given a few good hidings in your day,.

I bet if someone gave you a good hard kick in the nadgers you would curl up into a ball screaming ". Har had, missed both my legs ".

Libtards are sure full of shit.

Have a nice day libtard.

Ps do look up those things I've mentioned, at least you could try to educate yourself.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Oh, now you've written "ha" so many times, that must mean you're definitely laughing this time(!).

You're still triggered, still angry, and still pumping out more and more insults. You don't have to pretend any more. We've learned your tells.

Calm down. It's all right. For the record, it wasn't me who triggered you here.

Original comment

Oh, now you've written "ha" so many times, that must mean you're definitely laughing this time(!).

You're still triggered, still angry, and still pumping out more and more insults. You don't have to pretend any more. We've learned your tells.

Calm down. It's all right. For the record, it wasn't me who triggered you here.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Tell you what, why don't you crawl away and talk about me behind my back. Oh yes I can see you already have. Ha ha.

Original comment

Tell you what, why don't you crawl away and talk about me behind my back. Oh yes I can see you already have. Ha ha.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (20 days ago)

Haha! Bob triggered him here too! Just ask Real Tard to look up something he doesn't know about and he will always avoid the question and get all triggered and upset. He's hanging by his computer screen right now waiting to give you another tirade of Libtard insults, all while pretending to laugh !

Walter needs to up his game if he wants to trigger Real Tard as often as Bob.

Original comment

Haha! Bob triggered him here too! Just ask Real Tard to look up something he doesn't know about and he will always avoid the question and get all triggered and upset. He's hanging by his computer screen right now waiting to give you another tirade of Libtard insults, all while pretending to laugh !

Walter needs to up his game if he wants to trigger Real Tard as often as Bob.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (19 days ago)

"Nitpicking"? I point out your post "bowing in Allah" makes no sense and you call that nitpicking?

If I were going to nitpick, I'd point out the correct spelling of "riposte" - but I won't so there's no need to feel too triggered now. I'm still curious, though, as to what you mean by "bowing in Allah."

It seems like looking up the precautionary principle actually was too tricky for you, so here's a quick copy and paste (from the HSE):

"The precautionary principle shifts the burden of proof in demonstrating presence of risk or degree of safety towards the hazard creator."

I'm still open to your explanation about why this should stop me leaving the house.

Original comment

"Nitpicking"? I point out your post "bowing in Allah" makes no sense and you call that nitpicking?

If I were going to nitpick, I'd point out the correct spelling of "riposte" - but I won't so there's no need to feel too triggered now. I'm still curious, though, as to what you mean by "bowing in Allah."

It seems like looking up the precautionary principle actually was too tricky for you, so here's a quick copy and paste (from the HSE):

"The precautionary principle shifts the burden of proof in demonstrating presence of risk or degree of safety towards the hazard creator."

I'm still open to your explanation about why this should stop me leaving the house.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

That's right Bob, you just attack my spellchecker, because that's all you got.

Of course if it's only a perceived potential risk, then the precautionary principle removes the burden from the libtard of having to demonstrate that there's a hazard, known to intelligent people as chicken little syndrome.

Btw the precautionary principle applied to the human race would decree that the rest of the world rises up and exterminates all Muslims for the excessive violence they display to everyone else using the justification of Eugenic, but I don't see you advocating that application of libtard logic.

Original comment

That's right Bob, you just attack my spellchecker, because that's all you got.

Of course if it's only a perceived potential risk, then the precautionary principle removes the burden from the libtard of having to demonstrate that there's a hazard, known to intelligent people as chicken little syndrome.

Btw the precautionary principle applied to the human race would decree that the rest of the world rises up and exterminates all Muslims for the excessive violence they display to everyone else using the justification of Eugenic, but I don't see you advocating that application of libtard logic.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (19 days ago)

Er, no. I'm not attacking your spellchecker - I'm teasing you for not using it.

And I'm attacking your ability to interpret the written word. If you think all I have is to "attack [your] spellchecker", you need to up your game on the reading front, me old china.

And I'm attacking your gnat's attention span - try to stay on topic and answer the question about leaving the hoiuse.

And I'm attacking your logic (or lack of it). Your second paragraph bears no relation to what intelligent people mean by the precautionary principle. It's just more of your alt-right drivel; throwing some words together in the hope that they seem clever and stand up to scrutiny. (They don't.)

And I'm attacking you for your racism and bigotry.

Is that a long enough list of your alt-right nonsense?

OK, here's your challenge: don't get too triggered now.

Original comment

Er, no. I'm not attacking your spellchecker - I'm teasing you for not using it.

And I'm attacking your ability to interpret the written word. If you think all I have is to "attack [your] spellchecker", you need to up your game on the reading front, me old china.

And I'm attacking your gnat's attention span - try to stay on topic and answer the question about leaving the hoiuse.

And I'm attacking your logic (or lack of it). Your second paragraph bears no relation to what intelligent people mean by the precautionary principle. It's just more of your alt-right drivel; throwing some words together in the hope that they seem clever and stand up to scrutiny. (They don't.)

And I'm attacking you for your racism and bigotry.

Is that a long enough list of your alt-right nonsense?

OK, here's your challenge: don't get too triggered now.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Just flagging this up; if 'Real Mad' is struggling in the way that we all think he is struggling, what you're doing is bordering on bullying. He's not equipped to deal with the points you're making, so banging the same drum and triggering him time and time again is just a bit mean. I'm pretty sure he has special educational needs (not meant as an insult) and really you shouldn't feel the need to tease people like that.

Original comment

Just flagging this up; if 'Real Mad' is struggling in the way that we all think he is struggling, what you're doing is bordering on bullying. He's not equipped to deal with the points you're making, so banging the same drum and triggering him time and time again is just a bit mean. I'm pretty sure he has special educational needs (not meant as an insult) and really you shouldn't feel the need to tease people like that.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (19 days ago)

Fair point - I hadn't considered that. I'd just been thinking of him either as a troll who got his rocks off by insulting people or a shill whose "job" was to populate the site with statements supporting the alt-right. Leaving his posts unchallenged struck me as allowing them to become the default position of the site (a position with which I profoundly disagree).
What's your suggestion? Ignore and let the "libtard/exterminate all muslims" posts go unchallenged? Push back? Something else?

Original comment

Fair point - I hadn't considered that. I'd just been thinking of him either as a troll who got his rocks off by insulting people or a shill whose "job" was to populate the site with statements supporting the alt-right. Leaving his posts unchallenged struck me as allowing them to become the default position of the site (a position with which I profoundly disagree).
What's your suggestion? Ignore and let the "libtard/exterminate all muslims" posts go unchallenged? Push back? Something else?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Even if he is a troll or a shill, trying to reason with him isn't going to work, is it? I still suspect he has educational problems, as even a troll would make a passing attempt to to answer points made against them, whereas 'Mad' literally can't even engage with what you're saying at all.

Either way, no one here takes him seriously, so the only person you need to show anything to is the troll himself, and for various reasons he will be unable to learn. Pigeon chess. I've watched countless regulars on here humiliate him with simple objective truths, back him into a corner, and trigger his frantic insults, yet he won't change. It's how he gets attention, I suppose.

If it makes you feel better, you have definitely triggered him on this thread. He managed three different replies in his last batch, so well done.

Original comment

Even if he is a troll or a shill, trying to reason with him isn't going to work, is it? I still suspect he has educational problems, as even a troll would make a passing attempt to to answer points made against them, whereas 'Mad' literally can't even engage with what you're saying at all.

Either way, no one here takes him seriously, so the only person you need to show anything to is the troll himself, and for various reasons he will be unable to learn. Pigeon chess. I've watched countless regulars on here humiliate him with simple objective truths, back him into a corner, and trigger his frantic insults, yet he won't change. It's how he gets attention, I suppose.

If it makes you feel better, you have definitely triggered him on this thread. He managed three different replies in his last batch, so well done.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
TheBob TheBob (19 days ago)

That last paragraph sounds like you're having a bit of a "go" at me. I acknowledged your point and have not risen to the bait since - so is it me mis-reading or are you indeed having a go at me for pushing back at Real Mad before you raised the possibility of SEN?

In any case, my question still stands: how should we respond to the stream of insulting bigotry?

"Don't feed the troll" and do nothing?

Respond in kind? I agree that doesn't seem to reduce the nonsense.

Ask Boreme to ban/censor? That would be a blow to freedom of speech.

Is it crueller/more bullying to give or withhold the attention? I don't know.

You write with an empathy for a struggling soul. I admit I did not share that until you made your point - and I'm now open to it. However, I'm also heartily sick of reading the insults, drivel and racism with no willingness or ability on the part of the poster to respond or engage other than with yet more insults, drivel and racism.

Original comment

That last paragraph sounds like you're having a bit of a "go" at me. I acknowledged your point and have not risen to the bait since - so is it me mis-reading or are you indeed having a go at me for pushing back at Real Mad before you raised the possibility of SEN?

In any case, my question still stands: how should we respond to the stream of insulting bigotry?

"Don't feed the troll" and do nothing?

Respond in kind? I agree that doesn't seem to reduce the nonsense.

Ask Boreme to ban/censor? That would be a blow to freedom of speech.

Is it crueller/more bullying to give or withhold the attention? I don't know.

You write with an empathy for a struggling soul. I admit I did not share that until you made your point - and I'm now open to it. However, I'm also heartily sick of reading the insults, drivel and racism with no willingness or ability on the part of the poster to respond or engage other than with yet more insults, drivel and racism.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Try being more intelligent and less sheep like. Try not to be offended when someone points out that your "axioms " aren't. Oh and being a grammar Nazi is the last refuge of the libtard.

You're welcome.

Original comment

Try being more intelligent and less sheep like. Try not to be offended when someone points out that your "axioms " aren't. Oh and being a grammar Nazi is the last refuge of the libtard.

You're welcome.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (13 days ago)

The saddest attribute of libtards is their exultation of science to that of a sacred cow whilst trying to stamp out heterodox views.

They litterly have no awareness of what science actually is.

Original comment

The saddest attribute of libtards is their exultation of science to that of a sacred cow whilst trying to stamp out heterodox views.

They litterly have no awareness of what science actually is.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: real mad (13 days ago)
Latest comment:

Do you know, a survey proved to a 98.2% significance level against the null hypothesis h that liberals are full of shit on all science subjects.

Original comment
Latest comment:

Do you know, a survey proved to a 98.2% significance level against the null hypothesis h that liberals are full of shit on all science subjects.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

I'm not having a go; I'm just trying to work out what you're trying to achieve. I have been in your shoes plenty of times - you reach a point where you couldn't make it any clearer to 'Mad' and to other readers, and he still sadly cannot understand and yet you feel obliged to continue. In fact, the more you simplify it, the more embarassed and angry he seems to be, and he reacts in the only way he knows how - generalised insults and distractions.

Personally, like Guesting I think the idea is probably not to feed him. You can't educate him, that's certain. He comes out with "insults, drivel and racism" because of his background and ability (and possible learning disorder), and nothing you can say will change those factors, and nothing he can do will change them either. He is a victim. Highlight the odd amusing gaff, by all means, but returning to him again and again with salient ideas that he can't answer, expecting him to respond like an adult, is missing the point. He has missed out on things that we take for granted.

He's a bit of an Ali G figure. Maybe, possibly, he's a real character who is genuinely as unfortunate as he seems. Or maybe he is just an act, designed to promote return visits to this website, or a certain agenda. Either way, to take him seriously seems to be a waste of time, and seems to encourage his tantrums. Well that's my two cents anyway.

Original comment

I'm not having a go; I'm just trying to work out what you're trying to achieve. I have been in your shoes plenty of times - you reach a point where you couldn't make it any clearer to 'Mad' and to other readers, and he still sadly cannot understand and yet you feel obliged to continue. In fact, the more you simplify it, the more embarassed and angry he seems to be, and he reacts in the only way he knows how - generalised insults and distractions.

Personally, like Guesting I think the idea is probably not to feed him. You can't educate him, that's certain. He comes out with "insults, drivel and racism" because of his background and ability (and possible learning disorder), and nothing you can say will change those factors, and nothing he can do will change them either. He is a victim. Highlight the odd amusing gaff, by all means, but returning to him again and again with salient ideas that he can't answer, expecting him to respond like an adult, is missing the point. He has missed out on things that we take for granted.

He's a bit of an Ali G figure. Maybe, possibly, he's a real character who is genuinely as unfortunate as he seems. Or maybe he is just an act, designed to promote return visits to this website, or a certain agenda. Either way, to take him seriously seems to be a waste of time, and seems to encourage his tantrums. Well that's my two cents anyway.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Love the screwed up defensive rationalisation to deal with the cognitive dissonance. Yep the poor little snowflake is all upset, because someone doesn't buy into their shallow and delusional fake little world

I do so enjoy winding up arrogant Libtards, especially as they always start it with a condescending " put down".

Original comment

Love the screwed up defensive rationalisation to deal with the cognitive dissonance. Yep the poor little snowflake is all upset, because someone doesn't buy into their shallow and delusional fake little world

I do so enjoy winding up arrogant Libtards, especially as they always start it with a condescending " put down".

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

The best way to demonstrate why someone's logic is absurd is to apply their reasoning to another scenario, Libtards like you are sophistry personified...

Ah well

Original comment

The best way to demonstrate why someone's logic is absurd is to apply their reasoning to another scenario, Libtards like you are sophistry personified...

Ah well

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Btw not struggling, just laughing at you

Original comment

Btw not struggling, just laughing at you

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (19 days ago)

Pretending to laugh again! Yep, definitely triggered.

You always struggle on here because you insist on talking about things you don't understand. I have seen complete idiots here correct you on simple mistakes, and it just brings on another of your tantrums.

Original comment

Pretending to laugh again! Yep, definitely triggered.

You always struggle on here because you insist on talking about things you don't understand. I have seen complete idiots here correct you on simple mistakes, and it just brings on another of your tantrums.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Could you point out where I've been corrected, apart from spellchecking. ?

.That's right, you can't.

Original comment

Could you point out where I've been corrected, apart from spellchecking. ?

.That's right, you can't.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

I realise you won't admit to any of these, and I don't want to rub this in, but it's fairly easy to give examples. I think it was Walter who taught you about the simple basics of climate change. Q showed you how to correctly denote rho, and how a projection doesn't assume the world is flat, and the difference between mathematical operations, and various physics points. Bob has corrected you that the precautionary principle doesn't involve not leaving the house, and several other lessons. Someone also taught you that Robart isn't Roberts, and that he was appointed by Bush, and also that Saudia Arabia isn't on Trump's list. Someone else corrected your views on SEO. The BoreMe editor corrected your paranoid assumption that you had been blocked. I could go on and on and on, citing videos about politics, geography, technology. I literally can't recall a single page where you haven't proffered a shallow second-hand misunderstanding that has then been corrected by someone.

Anyway, you have an excellent range of excuses and I don't want to make you feel even smaller. By all means, tell us it's just our Libtard brains and the Libtard internet ganging up on you and making up fake news. Denial is a speciality of yours. You've also told us that Libtards hate being corrected, and refuse to accept further information. Let's see how you deal with this in a non-Libtard, non-Alinsky way.

Original comment

I realise you won't admit to any of these, and I don't want to rub this in, but it's fairly easy to give examples. I think it was Walter who taught you about the simple basics of climate change. Q showed you how to correctly denote rho, and how a projection doesn't assume the world is flat, and the difference between mathematical operations, and various physics points. Bob has corrected you that the precautionary principle doesn't involve not leaving the house, and several other lessons. Someone also taught you that Robart isn't Roberts, and that he was appointed by Bush, and also that Saudia Arabia isn't on Trump's list. Someone else corrected your views on SEO. The BoreMe editor corrected your paranoid assumption that you had been blocked. I could go on and on and on, citing videos about politics, geography, technology. I literally can't recall a single page where you haven't proffered a shallow second-hand misunderstanding that has then been corrected by someone.

Anyway, you have an excellent range of excuses and I don't want to make you feel even smaller. By all means, tell us it's just our Libtard brains and the Libtard internet ganging up on you and making up fake news. Denial is a speciality of yours. You've also told us that Libtards hate being corrected, and refuse to accept further information. Let's see how you deal with this in a non-Libtard, non-Alinsky way.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

Gee you're delusional. How many times did I explain how precedence works in Law ?.

Incidentally this passive aggressive and childish refusal to acknowledge facts, is common for Libtards. They will refuse to concede a point, even when a two minute search will confirm it.

Original comment

Gee you're delusional. How many times did I explain how precedence works in Law ?.

Incidentally this passive aggressive and childish refusal to acknowledge facts, is common for Libtards. They will refuse to concede a point, even when a two minute search will confirm it.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

Just as he said.

Incidentally this passive aggressive and childish refusal to acknowledge facts, is common for you. You will refuse to concede a point, even when a two minute search will confirm it.

Are you a Libtard? Because you fit your descriptions perfectly. I mean perfectly .

Original comment

Just as he said.

Incidentally this passive aggressive and childish refusal to acknowledge facts, is common for you. You will refuse to concede a point, even when a two minute search will confirm it.

Are you a Libtard? Because you fit your descriptions perfectly. I mean perfectly .

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

Yes cos obsessively reapeating unfacts that don't match up with reality, is what normal people do.

Eg quick check reveals

1) that Judge Victoria Roberts stay preceded judge Robarts, on trump's 1st travel bans (It's a chronological thang ), and

2) they had nothing to do with Trump's 2nd Travel ban .......... Which was the one I was talking about. ( Its a clue when I mentioned Hawaii).

Mind you its fun watching the libtard scream until he is blue in the face, when a simple check would show him to be wrong yet again. I did drop hints like "Hawaii" and " Maryland", to try and get him to check his sources but hey, being a libturd is all about shouting down people with invented unfacts.

Ps this won't stop him doing his "passive aggressive routine" on me, but I can't stop that, only extensive help from a psychiatrist, and/or a good hiding can change that behaviour.

Have a nice day retard boy.

Original comment

Yes cos obsessively reapeating unfacts that don't match up with reality, is what normal people do.

Eg quick check reveals

1) that Judge Victoria Roberts stay preceded judge Robarts, on trump's 1st travel bans (It's a chronological thang ), and

2) they had nothing to do with Trump's 2nd Travel ban .......... Which was the one I was talking about. ( Its a clue when I mentioned Hawaii).

Mind you its fun watching the libtard scream until he is blue in the face, when a simple check would show him to be wrong yet again. I did drop hints like "Hawaii" and " Maryland", to try and get him to check his sources but hey, being a libturd is all about shouting down people with invented unfacts.

Ps this won't stop him doing his "passive aggressive routine" on me, but I can't stop that, only extensive help from a psychiatrist, and/or a good hiding can change that behaviour.

Have a nice day retard boy.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

I can't be bothered to go too far into this, because we all know you were wrong, including you. No, you weren't talking about Roberts, because it was the libtroll who started the conversation and he only referred to judges who disagreed with Trump. You then said "the judges were appointed by Obama", nothing about which judges in particular, or which ban, just an incorrect assumption. You've only added the precedence thing to try and save face. It doesn't matter who came first - you said the judges were appointed by Obama, and one of the main instigating judges wasn't. Deal with it. Spilt milk.

Anyway, I've seen all this explained to you by people more patient than I am. I'm just pointing out that we have all seen you get corrected on here countless times. But good job on the denial. Classic Alinsky tactic, am I right?

Original comment

I can't be bothered to go too far into this, because we all know you were wrong, including you. No, you weren't talking about Roberts, because it was the libtroll who started the conversation and he only referred to judges who disagreed with Trump. You then said "the judges were appointed by Obama", nothing about which judges in particular, or which ban, just an incorrect assumption. You've only added the precedence thing to try and save face. It doesn't matter who came first - you said the judges were appointed by Obama, and one of the main instigating judges wasn't. Deal with it. Spilt milk.

Anyway, I've seen all this explained to you by people more patient than I am. I'm just pointing out that we have all seen you get corrected on here countless times. But good job on the denial. Classic Alinsky tactic, am I right?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

The judge in Hawaii ( Derrick k Watson )s a former classmate of Obummer and was appointed by Obummer, and made the decision (out of the blue) whilst Obummer was visiting Hawaii.

The Maryland judge Theodore Chuang was also appointed by Obummer.

Any more problems with basic fact checking retard boy ?

Original comment

The judge in Hawaii ( Derrick k Watson )s a former classmate of Obummer and was appointed by Obummer, and made the decision (out of the blue) whilst Obummer was visiting Hawaii.

The Maryland judge Theodore Chuang was also appointed by Obummer.

Any more problems with basic fact checking retard boy ?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (18 days ago)

Crumbs, you still haven't dealt with it have you? You've named two judges appointed by Obama. Unfortunately, you originally thought (and said) that all the judges speaking out against Trump were appointed by Obama. That was wrong, along with one or two other things you've said. Simple fact-checking. But hey, never mind, there there, don't cry, let's all move on. You wouldn't want to stew would you? Its just a crystal clear and undeniable example of when someone catches you out with an objective truth, and when you have another tantrum of abuse because of it.

Adding a PS is all well and good, but a PS half an hour later, often followed by another, with increasing insults and decreasing composure? It smacks of desperation.

I'm flattered you call me trigger, but actually I think you'll find it's Bob and Guesting who are triggering you these days. I'm just an amused observer that can see your pain. Personally, I'm trying to take a new approach with you. I know most of this, how you are, isn't your fault, and the allegations of 'bullying an unfortunate' seem sadly rather apt. Apologies. Let's try to orchestrate an ending:

Let's say you're totally right, about everything. No one here has ever caught you out - not on anything. Your level of education is exemplary, your intellect is really quite intimidating, and we're all seriously impressed. Gee, we wish we weren't Libtards. We wish we could be more like you, who seems nothing but contented, well-informed, and emotionally balanced. OK?

Original comment

Crumbs, you still haven't dealt with it have you? You've named two judges appointed by Obama. Unfortunately, you originally thought (and said) that all the judges speaking out against Trump were appointed by Obama. That was wrong, along with one or two other things you've said. Simple fact-checking. But hey, never mind, there there, don't cry, let's all move on. You wouldn't want to stew would you? Its just a crystal clear and undeniable example of when someone catches you out with an objective truth, and when you have another tantrum of abuse because of it.

Adding a PS is all well and good, but a PS half an hour later, often followed by another, with increasing insults and decreasing composure? It smacks of desperation.

I'm flattered you call me trigger, but actually I think you'll find it's Bob and Guesting who are triggering you these days. I'm just an amused observer that can see your pain. Personally, I'm trying to take a new approach with you. I know most of this, how you are, isn't your fault, and the allegations of 'bullying an unfortunate' seem sadly rather apt. Apologies. Let's try to orchestrate an ending:

Let's say you're totally right, about everything. No one here has ever caught you out - not on anything. Your level of education is exemplary, your intellect is really quite intimidating, and we're all seriously impressed. Gee, we wish we weren't Libtards. We wish we could be more like you, who seems nothing but contented, well-informed, and emotionally balanced. OK?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (18 days ago)

By god that's a long rant, but I guess I did push your face into those facts a bit too hard.

What's that word ....

Oh yes.....

Triggered.

Have a nice day, I have enjoyed our conversations

Original comment

By god that's a long rant, but I guess I did push your face into those facts a bit too hard.

What's that word ....

Oh yes.....

Triggered.

Have a nice day, I have enjoyed our conversations

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (17 days ago)

LOL what a suprise you can't answer any of his points.

libtards win again while poor triggered cheese brain types angry responses at midnight .

Original comment

LOL what a suprise you can't answer any of his points.

libtards win again while poor triggered cheese brain types angry responses at midnight .

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Lone ranger (17 days ago)

Have you seen a horse around here ?

Original comment

Have you seen a horse around here ?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Tonto (17 days ago)

No - but I've seen Roy Rogers

Original comment

No - but I've seen Roy Rogers

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (17 days ago)

Hi ho Silver, Leave Trigger alone.

Original comment

Hi ho Silver, Leave Trigger alone.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (17 days ago)

And definitely leave Triggered alone. Trigger(s) have done their job again and wound up Triggered, so he really needs a break. This page was brutal to the poor kid.

Original comment

And definitely leave Triggered alone. Trigger(s) have done their job again and wound up Triggered, so he really needs a break. This page was brutal to the poor kid.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (17 days ago)

Yep maybe I should leave the libtard alone

Ha ha.

Original comment

Yep maybe I should leave the libtard alone

Ha ha.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (17 days ago)

Yeah for sure. There's only so many times we can watch you get humiliated and still find it funny. Give yourself a break.

Original comment

Yeah for sure. There's only so many times we can watch you get humiliated and still find it funny. Give yourself a break.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (17 days ago)

Wotever.

Original comment

Wotever.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (19 days ago)

Sorry Bob did I derail your screwed up rationalisation by pointing out why your starting axiom is a pile of shit.

What a shame eh.

Original comment

Sorry Bob did I derail your screwed up rationalisation by pointing out why your starting axiom is a pile of shit.

What a shame eh.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (22 days ago)

Ha ha ha ha ha ha . Ah well off out.

Original comment

Ha ha ha ha ha ha . Ah well off out.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (22 days ago)

Yep, still pretending to laugh, Real Tard is triggered all right.

Now he is trying to save some face by pretending to have a social life.

Triggered !!!

Original comment

Yep, still pretending to laugh, Real Tard is triggered all right.

Now he is trying to save some face by pretending to have a social life.

Triggered !!!

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (21 days ago)

You know, some people reading this exchange would come to the conclusion that you have deep seated mental health problems, and they would be right.

Ah well it's a lovely day, have a nice day awaiting my reply.

Original comment

You know, some people reading this exchange would come to the conclusion that you have deep seated mental health problems, and they would be right.

Ah well it's a lovely day, have a nice day awaiting my reply.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (21 days ago)

Now Real Tard is pretending to have support like usual. Whenever he says the word 'people' he means just him and all his sock puppets. Any minute he will start talking to his invisible friend !! Bob is even better at Walter at triggering him these days.

Original comment

Now Real Tard is pretending to have support like usual. Whenever he says the word 'people' he means just him and all his sock puppets. Any minute he will start talking to his invisible friend !! Bob is even better at Walter at triggering him these days.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (20 days ago)

That's true, and you stayed glued to the computer to make sure all of yesterday whilst the rest of the country was out in the sunshine.

Original comment

That's true, and you stayed glued to the computer to make sure all of yesterday whilst the rest of the country was out in the sunshine.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
RELATED POSTS
Going green shouldn't be this hard
Going green shouldn't be this hard
Bill Nye vs climate change-denying physics professor
Bill Nye vs climate change-denying physics professor
Why humans are so bad at thinking about climate change
Why humans are so bad at thinking about climate change
How to win over Republicans on renewable energy
How to win over Republicans on renewable energy
Can climate change cause earthquakes?
Can climate change cause earthquakes?