SHARE
TAGS
<< Back to listing
Vote up (32) down (30)
Neil deGrasse Tyson on scientific literacy

Neil deGrasse Tyson on scientific literacy

(2:52) Inspiring monologue on the importance of science literacy, by astrophysicist and science educator Neil deGrasse Tyson.

You can comment as a guest, but registering gives you added benefits

Add your comment
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: The one and only MAD (1808 days ago)

Everyone with a brain knows Degrasse Tyson is yet another libtard fooled by the libtard delusion perpetuated by the mainstream media.

LINK

His problem like most sheeple is that he has a basic lack of comprehension in mathematics and physics. This is why you cannot have a meaningful conversation with these morons who are overwhelmed by self love and delusions of intellectualistics .

Hilarious

ReplyVote up (101)down (77)
Original comment

Everyone with a brain knows Degrasse Tyson is yet another libtard fooled by the libtard delusion perpetuated by the mainstream media.

LINK

His problem like most sheeple is that he has a basic lack of comprehension in mathematics and physics. This is why you cannot have a meaningful conversation with these morons who are overwhelmed by self love and delusions of intellectualistics .

Hilarious

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1807 days ago)

The real one and only MAD doesn't do links, bedsides degrass Tyson seems to have disappeared from the limelight. Wonder why ?

ReplyVote up (76)down (101)
Original comment

The real one and only MAD doesn't do links, bedsides degrass Tyson seems to have disappeared from the limelight. Wonder why ?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: QC (1807 days ago)

You're right, MAD would never have the nouse to look up a source and share it. Point taken.

Disappeared from the limelight? Err.. you know his Startalk radio show has just premiered, he's touting his startalk book on just about every channel, he's waist deep in his 'Make America Smart Again' campaign (for which you can now buy a t-shirt, if you're interested), and he's just done a spread in US weekly magazine. Really, what planet do you live on?

I think MAD should write to Tyson and share some of his 'intellectualistics&# 39; on maths and physics, as he's clearly a superior scientist. ;)

ReplyVote up (101)down (63)
Original comment

You're right, MAD would never have the nouse to look up a source and share it. Point taken.

Disappeared from the limelight? Err.. you know his Startalk radio show has just premiered, he's touting his startalk book on just about every channel, he's waist deep in his 'Make America Smart Again' campaign (for which you can now buy a t-shirt, if you're interested), and he's just done a spread in US weekly magazine. Really, what planet do you live on?

I think MAD should write to Tyson and share some of his 'intellectualistics&# 39; on maths and physics, as he's clearly a superior scientist. ;)

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Do you really think he is a cutting edge scientist.? More fool you, but one of the reasons why I don't do links is that I can think for myself. I don't need to regurgitate the opinion of a talking head, I leave that to the liberal fumducks.

ReplyVote up (101)down (40)
Original comment

Do you really think he is a cutting edge scientist.? More fool you, but one of the reasons why I don't do links is that I can think for myself. I don't need to regurgitate the opinion of a talking head, I leave that to the liberal fumducks.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: QC (1806 days ago)

When did I say he was a cutting edge scientist? Is it strawman time already? I merely suggested that as a Harvard educated scientist with a doctorate in astrophysics, he just might - just possibly - know a little more about maths and physics than MAD troll. Plus I just had to show you that he hasn't "disappeared from the limelight". I don't like the guy, but he's a bona fide astrophycist who still gets a lot of limelight.

If you can think for yourself and you're too smart to look at videos and articles in links, why do you watch videos here?

And Guest - here are your criteria for the troll: Bragging ("I don't need links"), excessively abusive, stereotypical catchphrases. Is this MAD the troll too?

ReplyVote up (101)down (64)
Original comment

When did I say he was a cutting edge scientist? Is it strawman time already? I merely suggested that as a Harvard educated scientist with a doctorate in astrophysics, he just might - just possibly - know a little more about maths and physics than MAD troll. Plus I just had to show you that he hasn't "disappeared from the limelight". I don't like the guy, but he's a bona fide astrophycist who still gets a lot of limelight.

If you can think for yourself and you're too smart to look at videos and articles in links, why do you watch videos here?

And Guest - here are your criteria for the troll: Bragging ("I don't need links"), excessively abusive, stereotypical catchphrases. Is this MAD the troll too?

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

Hahah, no this is probably the real Mad in defensive mode. I believe the first poster is our "libtard" troll.

ReplyVote up (83)down (101)
Original comment

Hahah, no this is probably the real Mad in defensive mode. I believe the first poster is our "libtard" troll.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

QC, look at the exchange that has taken place below us. I can't really see that Mad is the problem. Mad is merely the victim of our "libtard" trolls displaced aggression.

ReplyVote up (101)down (46)
Original comment

QC, look at the exchange that has taken place below us. I can't really see that Mad is the problem. Mad is merely the victim of our "libtard" trolls displaced aggression.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: QC (1805 days ago)

I think it's genuinely strange that you think that. I'm beginning to wonder about you.

Let's assume you're correct in that all of Mad's comments on this page are his own (other than the first). Before libtroll commented, Mad replied to one of my messages saying "Hi libtard,. Here is something that even you can understand... Now to know why I laugh so much at fumduck libtards" and a short while later "the idiocy of sheepie libtards who think it's smart to be herded." And yet you think it's the libtroll who has 'displaced aggression'? Really? Literally, every comment Mad writes is a furious mix of silly insults, non-sequiturs and total delusions. I mean what kind of abusive narcissist desperately tries to devalue the credentials of an astrophycist? It's amusingly stupid, and entirely consistent with Mad's reasoning skills.

Yes libtroll responds in unhelpful kind, but Mad has always fired off numerous ignorant rants by that point that pass under your radar. I think it's quite amusing to see fire being fought with fire - the rest of us tried reason for 2/3 of the thread and where did that get us? Personally, I don't feel the need to explain to someone with clinical narcissism why DeGrasse Tyson obviously and uncontroversially has a better understanding of physics than him, but if libtroll wants a go that's fine by me.

So I'll suggest again; if you object to aggressive, ignorant, barely coherent, abusive rants, then be brave and challenge Mad straight away rather than singling out the libtroll when he finally bites back. Maybe if you nip it in the bud we won't be subjected to the libtroll-Mad pissing match.

ReplyVote up (101)down (54)
Original comment

I think it's genuinely strange that you think that. I'm beginning to wonder about you.

Let's assume you're correct in that all of Mad's comments on this page are his own (other than the first). Before libtroll commented, Mad replied to one of my messages saying "Hi libtard,. Here is something that even you can understand... Now to know why I laugh so much at fumduck libtards" and a short while later "the idiocy of sheepie libtards who think it's smart to be herded." And yet you think it's the libtroll who has 'displaced aggression'? Really? Literally, every comment Mad writes is a furious mix of silly insults, non-sequiturs and total delusions. I mean what kind of abusive narcissist desperately tries to devalue the credentials of an astrophycist? It's amusingly stupid, and entirely consistent with Mad's reasoning skills.

Yes libtroll responds in unhelpful kind, but Mad has always fired off numerous ignorant rants by that point that pass under your radar. I think it's quite amusing to see fire being fought with fire - the rest of us tried reason for 2/3 of the thread and where did that get us? Personally, I don't feel the need to explain to someone with clinical narcissism why DeGrasse Tyson obviously and uncontroversially has a better understanding of physics than him, but if libtroll wants a go that's fine by me.

So I'll suggest again; if you object to aggressive, ignorant, barely coherent, abusive rants, then be brave and challenge Mad straight away rather than singling out the libtroll when he finally bites back. Maybe if you nip it in the bud we won't be subjected to the libtroll-Mad pissing match.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

I haven't really been singling out the libtroll. If you look back at the Elisabeth Warren video 3-4 weeks back, you'll see that I did a lengthy confrontation with Mad. I kept going at it until I was afraid he'd have an emotional breakdown. Since then he has improved in my opinion, and it's a shame if the libtroll once again lures him back into his old abusive ways.

Although I do think the libtroll's behaviour here was far worse than Mad's, I will respect the general consensus. Besides, policing the comments section on Boreme isn't my business anyway.

ReplyVote up (101)down (40)
Original comment

I haven't really been singling out the libtroll. If you look back at the Elisabeth Warren video 3-4 weeks back, you'll see that I did a lengthy confrontation with Mad. I kept going at it until I was afraid he'd have an emotional breakdown. Since then he has improved in my opinion, and it's a shame if the libtroll once again lures him back into his old abusive ways.

Although I do think the libtroll's behaviour here was far worse than Mad's, I will respect the general consensus. Besides, policing the comments section on Boreme isn't my business anyway.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: QC (1805 days ago)

Lures him back to his abusive ways? Again, I don't know how you fail to notice the dozens of messages Mad posted before the libtroll turned up, calling us fools, libtard fumducks, idiots etc. etc. Either abusive rants matter, or they don't. You shouldn't cherry-pick unless you have ulterior motives.

I think the libtroll is very marginally more blunt than Mad, but he only picks on Mad (rather than Mad's paranoid scatter-gun approach to anyone who intimidates him), and beneath the insulting turn-of-phrase he actually makes reasonable points. Moreover, he only seems to attack once Mad has already filled a thread with his usual delusional ranting. On a normal site, both would have been banned or muted by now, and arguably if Mad had been sorted people like the libtroll would never have crawled out.

ReplyVote up (101)down (39)
Original comment

Lures him back to his abusive ways? Again, I don't know how you fail to notice the dozens of messages Mad posted before the libtroll turned up, calling us fools, libtard fumducks, idiots etc. etc. Either abusive rants matter, or they don't. You shouldn't cherry-pick unless you have ulterior motives.

I think the libtroll is very marginally more blunt than Mad, but he only picks on Mad (rather than Mad's paranoid scatter-gun approach to anyone who intimidates him), and beneath the insulting turn-of-phrase he actually makes reasonable points. Moreover, he only seems to attack once Mad has already filled a thread with his usual delusional ranting. On a normal site, both would have been banned or muted by now, and arguably if Mad had been sorted people like the libtroll would never have crawled out.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1804 days ago)
Latest comment:

I just call it as I see it, but can't pinpoint why. You're probably right, my sympathies for Mad in this case could be irrational.

ReplyVote up (79)down (101)
Original comment
Latest comment:

I just call it as I see it, but can't pinpoint why. You're probably right, my sympathies for Mad in this case could be irrational.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

qc dont be dumb you do realise who our friend the anonymous guest is dont you ? theres a reason why he is immune to conservatards retarding ways

ReplyVote up (101)down (46)
Original comment

qc dont be dumb you do realise who our friend the anonymous guest is dont you ? theres a reason why he is immune to conservatards retarding ways

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: QC (1805 days ago)

If you're suggesting what I think you're suggesting, you may well be right but I struggle to care. I respond to anyone who believes what the commenter is saying, regardless of what their real identity might be.

ReplyVote up (101)down (56)
Original comment

If you're suggesting what I think you're suggesting, you may well be right but I struggle to care. I respond to anyone who believes what the commenter is saying, regardless of what their real identity might be.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

I haven't really been singling out the libtroll. If you look back at the Elisabeth Warren video 3-4 weeks back, you'll see that I did a lengthy confrontation with Mad. I kept going at it until I was afraid he'd have an emotional breakdown. Since then he has improved in my opinion, and it's a shame if the libtroll once again lures him back into his old abusive ways.

Although I do think the libtroll's behaviour here was far worse than Mad's, I will respect the general consensus. Besides, policing the comments section on Boreme isn't my business anyway.

ReplyVote up (101)down (71)
Original comment

I haven't really been singling out the libtroll. If you look back at the Elisabeth Warren video 3-4 weeks back, you'll see that I did a lengthy confrontation with Mad. I kept going at it until I was afraid he'd have an emotional breakdown. Since then he has improved in my opinion, and it's a shame if the libtroll once again lures him back into his old abusive ways.

Although I do think the libtroll's behaviour here was far worse than Mad's, I will respect the general consensus. Besides, policing the comments section on Boreme isn't my business anyway.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad (1805 days ago)

Emotional breakdown ??????? Bwaaaaaaaah. I just love shoving truth bombs in your face, and fauxohontus really does have some skeletons in her closet. The fact that the libtard left venerate the little fake, just goes show how blinkered and out of touch they are

She recently got caught failing to disclose a personal 1.5 million line of credit, as is required under the regulations. It must of just sllipped her mind...............

ReplyVote up (101)down (74)
Original comment

Emotional breakdown ??????? Bwaaaaaaaah. I just love shoving truth bombs in your face, and fauxohontus really does have some skeletons in her closet. The fact that the libtard left venerate the little fake, just goes show how blinkered and out of touch they are

She recently got caught failing to disclose a personal 1.5 million line of credit, as is required under the regulations. It must of just sllipped her mind...............

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1805 days ago)

Actually it was only 1.3 million, but hey 200,000 is peanuts to fauxcahontus, probably why she forgot all about it.

ReplyVote up (101)down (53)
Original comment

Actually it was only 1.3 million, but hey 200,000 is peanuts to fauxcahontus, probably why she forgot all about it.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1805 days ago)

Let's run through her average fumduck libtard logic on the subject of climate change

Libtard ; I know F*** all about mathematics and physical science, and so does my sociology professer, yet when it come to a subject that I know F*** all about I will side with my sociology professer in denouncing tby using abuse and the "denier" word to silence those twho have the education to raise legitimate questions about the validity and methods, and consequent conclusions of endless failed predictions.

Normal person ; Look at all those failed predictions. Fumduck libtard should shut his pig ignorant gob, for god's sake we are are all sick and tired of the endless scweaming of imminent disaster that fails to materialise, F*** me it's like listening to religious nutjobs who predict a new end of the world every other year. These F***wits must have a drug regime that has induced some serious brain damage that allows them to simply forget the past and start again, either that or their mother repeatedly dropped them on their head as a child. Etc etc and so on.

I think you can kind of understand why Joe public is ignoring the libtards on this one.

ReplyVote up (101)down (84)
Original comment

Let's run through her average fumduck libtard logic on the subject of climate change

Libtard ; I know F*** all about mathematics and physical science, and so does my sociology professer, yet when it come to a subject that I know F*** all about I will side with my sociology professer in denouncing tby using abuse and the "denier" word to silence those twho have the education to raise legitimate questions about the validity and methods, and consequent conclusions of endless failed predictions.

Normal person ; Look at all those failed predictions. Fumduck libtard should shut his pig ignorant gob, for god's sake we are are all sick and tired of the endless scweaming of imminent disaster that fails to materialise, F*** me it's like listening to religious nutjobs who predict a new end of the world every other year. These F***wits must have a drug regime that has induced some serious brain damage that allows them to simply forget the past and start again, either that or their mother repeatedly dropped them on their head as a child. Etc etc and so on.

I think you can kind of understand why Joe public is ignoring the libtards on this one.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

tldr

ReplyVote up (101)down (37)
Original comment

tldr

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

you think tyson is a libtard ? you think tyson knows fK all about mathematics and physical science ?

BWAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA conservatard lives up his own ass

ReplyVote up (101)down (51)
Original comment

you think tyson is a libtard ? you think tyson knows fK all about mathematics and physical science ?

BWAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA conservatard lives up his own ass

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1805 days ago)

If he is stupid enough to use the denier label to put down legitimate concerns then yes. history will judge him and his fellows, Politics can drive a particular science viewpoint into the limelight, but if you cut the corners trying to get the right result then eventually you will be found out, and your legacy will not last.

ReplyVote up (101)down (52)
Original comment

If he is stupid enough to use the denier label to put down legitimate concerns then yes. history will judge him and his fellows, Politics can drive a particular science viewpoint into the limelight, but if you cut the corners trying to get the right result then eventually you will be found out, and your legacy will not last.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1805 days ago)

If he is stupid enough to use the denier label to put down legitimate concerns then yes. history will judge him and his fellows, Politics can drive a particular science viewpoint into the limelight, but if you cut the corners trying to get the right result then eventually you will be found out, and your legacy will not last.

ReplyVote up (101)down (66)
Original comment

If he is stupid enough to use the denier label to put down legitimate concerns then yes. history will judge him and his fellows, Politics can drive a particular science viewpoint into the limelight, but if you cut the corners trying to get the right result then eventually you will be found out, and your legacy will not last.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

He's hasn't done any real science for years, and goodness me if there is a speculative area of physics, then it's cosmology.

Libtards elevate him above his station because he fits the profile and tells than what they want to hear. Confirmation bias in action.

ReplyVote up (83)down (101)
Original comment

He's hasn't done any real science for years, and goodness me if there is a speculative area of physics, then it's cosmology.

Libtards elevate him above his station because he fits the profile and tells than what they want to hear. Confirmation bias in action.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: QC (1806 days ago)

Oh alright - my bad. You obviously do understand far more about physics and maths than some Harvard schmuck with a MPhil and PhD in astrophysics. I'm honoured to even be talking with you, professor. If I were you, I'd write to the amateur and explain all the stuff he doesn't get. Let him know about Wikipedia; he's missing a trick.

ReplyVote up (96)down (101)
Original comment

Oh alright - my bad. You obviously do understand far more about physics and maths than some Harvard schmuck with a MPhil and PhD in astrophysics. I'm honoured to even be talking with you, professor. If I were you, I'd write to the amateur and explain all the stuff he doesn't get. Let him know about Wikipedia; he's missing a trick.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Hi libtard,. Here is something that even you can understand

Texas sharpshooter fallacy.

Take aim at a barn and blast away with your Magnum. Afterwards go and paint bulls eyes around the bullet holes.

That proves that you are a such a good shot does it ?????.

Now to know why I laugh so much at fumduck libtards who scour the interweb to zero in on someone that agrees other them.

ReplyVote up (101)down (55)
Original comment

Hi libtard,. Here is something that even you can understand

Texas sharpshooter fallacy.

Take aim at a barn and blast away with your Magnum. Afterwards go and paint bulls eyes around the bullet holes.

That proves that you are a such a good shot does it ?????.

Now to know why I laugh so much at fumduck libtards who scour the interweb to zero in on someone that agrees other them.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

Troll again. Too abusive, too much fake bragging, too many non-sequiturs, too many catch phrases. Mad isn't quite this stupid. Close run thing, but not quite. I'm getting the hang of this.

ReplyVote up (101)down (48)
Original comment

Troll again. Too abusive, too much fake bragging, too many non-sequiturs, too many catch phrases. Mad isn't quite this stupid. Close run thing, but not quite. I'm getting the hang of this.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Just laughing at the idiocy of sheepie libtards who think it's smart to be herded.

ReplyVote up (100)down (94)
Original comment

Just laughing at the idiocy of sheepie libtards who think it's smart to be herded.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

bwahahaa you are REAL mad arent you !! you got called out again. poor poor conservatard you know more physics than de grasse tyson BWAHAHAHAHA PLEASe !! you just got schooled son ! go back to breitbart and cry your salty tears . as guest said we are just bullying you so stop being a retard or its gonna keep happening . take your dumb ass gullible opinons else where we dont beleive any old bull shit here.

ReplyVote up (101)down (63)
Original comment

bwahahaa you are REAL mad arent you !! you got called out again. poor poor conservatard you know more physics than de grasse tyson BWAHAHAHAHA PLEASe !! you just got schooled son ! go back to breitbart and cry your salty tears . as guest said we are just bullying you so stop being a retard or its gonna keep happening . take your dumb ass gullible opinons else where we dont beleive any old bull shit here.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Yep that's a libtarded fumduck response. Too thick and uneducated to form opinions of their own , and hence have to rely on rebleating opinions carefully selected by political viewpoint.

Ha ha

ReplyVote up (101)down (94)
Original comment

Yep that's a libtarded fumduck response. Too thick and uneducated to form opinions of their own , and hence have to rely on rebleating opinions carefully selected by political viewpoint.

Ha ha

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

yep thats a conservatard dumb ass response . your REAL mad now. swallows every thing he reads on breitbart so cant explain any thing cant give sources. no education no knowldge of physics no knowledge of any thing but still pretends he is as smart as tyson . BAHAHAHAA in your dreams . so what happens ? the bob or qc or walter school him and take him down a peg and he goes wining with his typical insults . poor conservatard how we love to watch you crying . BWAHAHAAAAA your dumb even by trump shill standards .

ReplyVote up (101)down (83)
Original comment

yep thats a conservatard dumb ass response . your REAL mad now. swallows every thing he reads on breitbart so cant explain any thing cant give sources. no education no knowldge of physics no knowledge of any thing but still pretends he is as smart as tyson . BAHAHAHAA in your dreams . so what happens ? the bob or qc or walter school him and take him down a peg and he goes wining with his typical insults . poor conservatard how we love to watch you crying . BWAHAHAAAAA your dumb even by trump shill standards .

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Those that can do, libtards that can't have to play rebleat my selected leader, but Degrasse Tyson is only one of 20,000 or so physics doctorates, and he is going against the grain, the skeptical are drawn largely from physical science graduates

ReplyVote up (101)down (49)
Original comment

Those that can do, libtards that can't have to play rebleat my selected leader, but Degrasse Tyson is only one of 20,000 or so physics doctorates, and he is going against the grain, the skeptical are drawn largely from physical science graduates

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

yeh sure .. you just got schooled . 20 000 physics doctorates ( in your made up fake news world ) how many people alive got the NASA distinguished service medal ? you aint a physics graduate .. you aint a science graduate .. you aint a graduate .. and nasa sure as hell dont rate you . de grasse tyson is a full on astrophysics professor but SURE dumb ass your just as smart cos you look up stuff on wiki BWAHHAHAHAHAAAA your sorry little mad man i have taken dumps that are more skeptical than you and smarter too . face it you just shown your self up again and given us another excuse to bully your dumb retarded brain . dont get mad . get smart.

ReplyVote up (101)down (96)
Original comment

yeh sure .. you just got schooled . 20 000 physics doctorates ( in your made up fake news world ) how many people alive got the NASA distinguished service medal ? you aint a physics graduate .. you aint a science graduate .. you aint a graduate .. and nasa sure as hell dont rate you . de grasse tyson is a full on astrophysics professor but SURE dumb ass your just as smart cos you look up stuff on wiki BWAHHAHAHAHAAAA your sorry little mad man i have taken dumps that are more skeptical than you and smarter too . face it you just shown your self up again and given us another excuse to bully your dumb retarded brain . dont get mad . get smart.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Actually that figure is probably way underestimated .The US alone has about 6000 physics majors graduate every year.

Btw Dr Roy Spencer and Dr John Christy have NASA medals for services to climate science, yet Libtard fumducks like you denounce them as "Deniers", because they don't follow the party line.

Just another demonstration of the profound stupidity of fumduck libtards.The world really would be a better place if these brains damaged morons didn't exist.

Btw Tyson's medal was for services to communication of science, not science that he actually did, probably part of the Muslim outreach sept.

ReplyVote up (101)down (100)
Original comment

Actually that figure is probably way underestimated .The US alone has about 6000 physics majors graduate every year.

Btw Dr Roy Spencer and Dr John Christy have NASA medals for services to climate science, yet Libtard fumducks like you denounce them as "Deniers", because they don't follow the party line.

Just another demonstration of the profound stupidity of fumduck libtards.The world really would be a better place if these brains damaged morons didn't exist.

Btw Tyson's medal was for services to communication of science, not science that he actually did, probably part of the Muslim outreach sept.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Oh and looked up Tyson's medal. They gave the same NASA medal to William Shatner for Star Trek.

ReplyVote up (101)down (63)
Original comment

Oh and looked up Tyson's medal. They gave the same NASA medal to William Shatner for Star Trek.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

your missing the point dumb ass how many physics quals have you got ? how many awards from nasa ? oh right oh i see no quals at all in physics oh ok . who cares you can think for your self right ? education is ignorance BWAHAHAAA you say libtards only beleive in climate change cos of lack of physics and math and tyson knew more before he left school than you will ever know . 600 physics MAJORS ? omfg do you seriously not know the difference between a major and a doctorate ? tyson has 1 major from harvard in physics ( wheres yours from BWAHAHA ) , then 2 masters ( yours ?) and 1 doctorate in astrofuckingphysics ( long word for you ) . go look them up . he served on nasa advisory council and btw you wanna know what nasa think about climate change ? "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by more than a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change " its here LINK now go learn some thing or just stick ur head back up your ass . just another demo of how retarded some uneducated conservatards are . they desperately have to mock successful scientists just to justify there own ignorance . stick there heads in the sand the poor dumb shills . to them all they need is breitbart and wikipedia . tragic . to dumb to question what they read and investigate the actual data .. i'm done . tryng to convince a genuine special needs retard he doesnt know as much physics as degrasse tyson is hilarious but tiring .

ReplyVote up (101)down (68)
Original comment

your missing the point dumb ass how many physics quals have you got ? how many awards from nasa ? oh right oh i see no quals at all in physics oh ok . who cares you can think for your self right ? education is ignorance BWAHAHAAA you say libtards only beleive in climate change cos of lack of physics and math and tyson knew more before he left school than you will ever know . 600 physics MAJORS ? omfg do you seriously not know the difference between a major and a doctorate ? tyson has 1 major from harvard in physics ( wheres yours from BWAHAHA ) , then 2 masters ( yours ?) and 1 doctorate in astrofuckingphysics ( long word for you ) . go look them up . he served on nasa advisory council and btw you wanna know what nasa think about climate change ? "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by more than a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change " its here LINK now go learn some thing or just stick ur head back up your ass . just another demo of how retarded some uneducated conservatards are . they desperately have to mock successful scientists just to justify there own ignorance . stick there heads in the sand the poor dumb shills . to them all they need is breitbart and wikipedia . tragic . to dumb to question what they read and investigate the actual data .. i'm done . tryng to convince a genuine special needs retard he doesnt know as much physics as degrasse tyson is hilarious but tiring .

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Has your doctor changed your medication ?. 6000 US graduates a year translates into roughly 600 doctorates a year for the US alone, and I estimate 10,000 or so a year worldwide. 20,000 is a bit low as an estimate of the total number of world wide physics doctorates.

Dr Roy Spencer and Dr John Christy are still active research scientists and in this capacity have been called to give testimony to congress.

Have a nice day ya fumduck.

ReplyVote up (91)down (101)
Original comment

Has your doctor changed your medication ?. 6000 US graduates a year translates into roughly 600 doctorates a year for the US alone, and I estimate 10,000 or so a year worldwide. 20,000 is a bit low as an estimate of the total number of world wide physics doctorates.

Dr Roy Spencer and Dr John Christy are still active research scientists and in this capacity have been called to give testimony to congress.

Have a nice day ya fumduck.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1805 days ago)

keep plucking numbers out the air dumb ass . i know your used to making up data but we dont buy it sorry not without evidence . but you still miss the point .. however many doctorates there are you have none and tyson has plenty . deal with it . you had your chance in school you failed . some people arent cut out for study right . dumb ass ..tyson has testified for congress to ! haha just shot your self in your foot again . christy and spencer havent been recognised for decades.. wonder why ? tyson gets awards every year . most of them are trying to educate people that missed out on school . he would get a ******* nobel if he could teach you any physics BWAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

ReplyVote up (101)down (48)
Original comment

keep plucking numbers out the air dumb ass . i know your used to making up data but we dont buy it sorry not without evidence . but you still miss the point .. however many doctorates there are you have none and tyson has plenty . deal with it . you had your chance in school you failed . some people arent cut out for study right . dumb ass ..tyson has testified for congress to ! haha just shot your self in your foot again . christy and spencer havent been recognised for decades.. wonder why ? tyson gets awards every year . most of them are trying to educate people that missed out on school . he would get a ******* nobel if he could teach you any physics BWAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1805 days ago)

Oh just extrapolating from official US universities and colleges data to produce a rough order estimate, erring on the low side.

A trick you learn.

ReplyVote up (101)down (63)
Original comment

Oh just extrapolating from official US universities and colleges data to produce a rough order estimate, erring on the low side.

A trick you learn.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: (1806 days ago)

oh and i looked up christy and spencer .turns out they got there nasa awards in 1991 . wonder where there recent acolades are ? on the same page you say degrasse star talk tyson has disappeared from lime light ? BWAHA HAAAAA i love it when you trip your self up .

HAAHA

HAHAAAA

so easy

ReplyVote up (74)down (101)
Original comment

oh and i looked up christy and spencer .turns out they got there nasa awards in 1991 . wonder where there recent acolades are ? on the same page you say degrasse star talk tyson has disappeared from lime light ? BWAHA HAAAAA i love it when you trip your self up .

HAAHA

HAHAAAA

so easy

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
Guest: Real mad ha ha (1806 days ago)

Gene Roddenberry also got a NASA medal just like Tyson.

ReplyVote up (101)down (76)
Original comment

Gene Roddenberry also got a NASA medal just like Tyson.

Add your reply
Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code captcha


Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL
RELATED POSTS
Machine that completes one turn every 2.3 trillion years
Machine that completes one turn every 2.3 trillion years
FaceRig demo
FaceRig demo
AsapSCIENCE | The biggest lie about renewable energy
AsapSCIENCE | The biggest lie about renewable energy
Pendulum Marble Clock
Pendulum Marble Clock
The Map of Mathematics
The Map of Mathematics